Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2011

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate* Cons. Est.* 		180-day
Trend		 Rating
1 Li, Bradley 2998 2712 147 A25
2 Simonov, Timofey 2567 2295 68 A25
3 Doell, Ethan 2529 2260 85 A25
4 Chang, Jonathan 2501 2237 166 A25
5 Chen, Nuo 2524 2222 121 B25
6 Hayes, Stewart 2476 2217 168 B25
7 YE, Neilson 2742 2168 47 B25
8 Jeong, Yujun 2787 2168 2168 C25
9 Lozano, Veyron Jericho 2419 2147 43 B25
10 Wandji, Noah 2403 2139 39 A25
11 Zheng, Marcus 2380 2113 87 B25
12 Tan, Junghyun 2621 2107 - E24
13 Cheng, Logan 2368 2103 89 A25
14 Ozawa, Taishi 2304 2033 178 B25
15 Li, Edison 2229 1974 31 B25
16 Rodriguez, Tyler 2219 1959 122 C25
17 Lu, Jingyi 2181 1923 119 B25
18 Lu, Alex 2169 1900 47 C25
19 Tse, Ngon Yin Anson 2310 1899 - D24
20 XIA, Yimiao 2765 1891 - U
21 Yuan, Zhihe 2168 1862 31 C25
22 Bieler, Mason 2117 1858 71 A25
23 Hua, Aaron 2117 1856 52 B25
24 Shin, Noah 2102 1838 106 B25
25 Fang, Haoyu 2094 1837 105 B25
26 Park, William 2090 1831 178 D25
27 Bai, Austin 2083 1826 171 B25
28 Zou, Aaron 2266 1821 132 U
29 Fedeli, Francesco 2083 1815 85 C25
30 MENG, Fanlu 2934 1795 - U
31 Ko, Caleb 2050 1786 44 C25
32 Ong, Nicholas 2032 1770 168 C25
33 Xu, Nathan 1994 1736 100 C25
34 Li, Daniel 1991 1734 86 C25
35 Chen, Anson 1983 1725 47 B24
36 Leong, Chit Seong 2529 1714 - U
37 Chang, Eric Jonathan 1950 1694 72 D25
38 Zhang, Jiuyong 3193 1683 - E25
39 Cheng, Bob 2729 1683 - U
40 Zhang, Hanru 1914 1654 55 C25
41 Jin, Andy 1880 1624 87 C25
42 hart-syed, declan 1864 1609 44 D25
43 Wei, Winston 1858 1601 100 C25
44 Wei Jr, Shan 1857 1599 112 C25
45 Zhao, Ryan 1841 1588 89 D25
46 Suarez, David 1838 1581 9 B25
47 Jin, Xinyi 1914 1565 270 C25
48 Feldman, Leo 3034 1557 - U
49 LEE, JISUNG 1901 1557 - U
50 Jacob, Ezra 1812 1554 218 C25
51 Luo, Marcus Jiayao 2379 1545 - U
52 Gates, Combustion 1803 1543 327 C25
53 Mo, Ethan 1793 1535 - D24
54 LaTorre, Leonardo 1780 1528 69 C25
55 Oh, Joshua 1771 1517 395 D25
56 LI, ZONGLIN 2323 1516 - U
57 Chen, Owen 1762 1506 274 C25
58 Yang, David 1755 1504 199 C25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.