Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2011

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate* Cons. Est.* 		180-day
Trend		 Rating
1 Li, Bradley 2998 2712 143 A25
2 Simonov, Timofey 2571 2293 66 A25
3 Doell, Ethan 2541 2264 89 A25
4 Chang, Jonathan 2501 2237 166 A25
5 Chen, Nuo 2524 2222 121 A25
6 Hayes, Stewart 2476 2217 168 B25
7 YE, Neilson 2742 2168 47 B25
8 Jeong, Yujun 2787 2168 2168 C25
9 Lozano, Veyron Jericho 2432 2155 51 B25
10 Wandji, Noah 2403 2139 39 A25
11 Zheng, Marcus 2389 2118 92 A25
12 Tan, Junghyun 2621 2107 - E24
13 Cheng, Logan 2333 2064 49 A25
14 Ozawa, Taishi 2304 2033 155 B25
15 Li, Edison 2229 1974 31 B25
16 Rodriguez, Tyler 2228 1964 127 B25
17 Lu, Jingyi 2182 1921 117 B25
18 Lu, Alex 2169 1900 25 C25
19 Tse, Ngon Yin Anson 2310 1899 - D24
20 XIA, Yimiao 2765 1891 - U
21 Hua, Aaron 2147 1882 50 B25
22 Bieler, Mason 2125 1862 67 A25
23 Yuan, Zhihe 2168 1862 31 C25
24 Shin, Noah 2124 1857 125 B25
25 Fang, Haoyu 2105 1844 112 B25
26 Bai, Austin 2106 1842 187 B25
27 Park, William 2090 1831 178 C25
28 Zou, Aaron 2266 1821 132 U
29 Fedeli, Francesco 2083 1815 85 C25
30 Ko, Caleb 2066 1800 58 C25
31 MENG, Fanlu 2934 1795 - U
32 Ong, Nicholas 2052 1788 150 C25
33 Chen, Anson 2003 1743 65 B24
34 Xu, Nathan 1993 1732 53 C25
35 Li, Daniel 1988 1729 81 C25
36 Leong, Chit Seong 2529 1714 - U
37 Chang, Eric Jonathan 1948 1690 68 D25
38 Zhang, Hanru 1941 1683 84 C25
39 Zhang, Jiuyong 3193 1683 - E25
40 Cheng, Bob 2729 1683 - U
41 Wei, Winston 1922 1663 162 C25
42 Jin, Andy 1886 1633 4 C25
43 hart-syed, declan 1864 1609 44 D25
44 Jacob, Ezra 1849 1591 255 C25
45 Wei Jr, Shan 1849 1587 100 C25
46 Suarez, David 1838 1581 60 B25
47 Zhao, Ryan 1832 1577 78 D25
48 Jin, Xinyi 1914 1565 270 C25
49 Feldman, Leo 3034 1557 - U
50 LEE, JISUNG 1901 1557 - U
51 LaTorre, Leonardo 1803 1549 90 C25
52 Luo, Marcus Jiayao 2379 1545 - U
53 Yang, David 1796 1544 239 C25
54 Gates, Combustion 1803 1543 277 C25
55 Mo, Ethan 1793 1535 - D24
56 Kuo, Phineas 1774 1520 10 C25
57 LI, ZONGLIN 2323 1516 - U
58 Chen, Owen 1776 1515 283 C25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.