Strength Ranking

Women's Epee, Birth Year 2010

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 LEE, REGINA 3510 3242 179 A24
2 Tolsma, Chloe (CJ) 3187 2927 72 A24
3 Profis, Liora 2942 2682 84 A24
4 Wang, Ziqi (yoyo) 2857 2602 18 A24
5 Ferreira de Melo, Adriana 2776 2512 168 B24
6 Guo, Luxi 2691 2439 50 A24
7 Yilmaz, Pinar 2680 2418 87 A24
8 Beaver, Ava 2644 2383 107 B24
9 Wang, Jessie 2597 2344 61 C24
10 Presman, Aerin 2575 2319 92 B24
11 Lee, Camilla 2515 2262 1 C23
12 Sun, Zeyu 2469 2202 4 B24
13 Jiang, Serena 2508 2145 423 B24
14 Liscum, Vivian 2390 2130 95 B24
15 Chen, Stephanie 2555 2118 434 C24
16 Wang, Victoria 2359 2107 31 C24
17 Schmitt, Harper 2347 2089 58 B23
18 Martinez, Christina 2354 2085 239 B24
19 Lin, Ariel 2307 2054 8 C23
20 Iyer, Ishana 2276 2015 107 B23
21 Kane, Chloe 2292 2006 19 E24
22 Kanaskar, Ila 2276 2003 34 C24
23 GANSER, Nicole 2257 1998 75 B24
24 Li, Azalea 2327 1908 34 D24
25 Suico, Kyubi Emmanuelle 2142 1865 191 C24
26 Wang, Ziqiao (Claire) 2121 1862 125 B24
27 Wang, Sophie 2102 1834 205 C24
28 McQueen, Morgan 2122 1834 19 C24
29 Lin, Isabel 2104 1827 30 E23
30 Lin, Laura 2086 1816 44 D23
31 Lee, Yeriel 2104 1808 71 C24
32 Blakey, Heaven 2421 1792 1792 D24
33 Yung, Bethany 2134 1750 49 E23
34 Beatie, Isabella 2002 1741 13 D24
35 Hale, Avery 2020 1728 46 C24
36 Kang, Yenna 2050 1695 59 C23
37 Stern, Savannah 2002 1694 442 C24
38 Shayakhmetova, Suzanna 1959 1684 105 D24
39 Zhang, Michelle 2352 1679 480 D23
40 Wright, Madison 1935 1658 37 D24
41 Kutsy, Olga 2065 1649 1649 C24
42 Wei, Sherry 1947 1647 51 C23
43 Toffelmire, Audrey 1941 1645 - U
44 Chiou-Williams, Matea 1973 1644 18 E23
45 Bi, Michelle 1909 1642 54 D23
46 Li, Yunxuan (Joy) 1941 1637 55 D24
47 Dwiggins, Reese 1935 1575 23 U
48 Mai, Mailan 2142 1564 18 E24
49 Zhu, Riley 1896 1557 287 D24
50 Elterman, Kate 1844 1555 113 D24
51 Flitman, Gabrielle 1886 1547 89 C24
52 Buca, Nora 1924 1547 45 E23
53 Sherman, Olivia 1953 1540 197 E24
54 Awalegaonkar, Saina 1868 1534 419 D24

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.