Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Women's EpeeBirth Year 2012

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Xu, Yvette, Zixuan 2865 2583 194 A26
2 Habek, Sophia 2771 2507 10 A25
3 Adyanthaya, Anika 2618 2367 167 A26
4 Dhaiya, Tanya 2523 2271 77 A26
5 Hernasa, Anna 2436 2183 54 A26
6 Pei, Claire 2322 2068 70 A26
7 Chi, Zoe 2322 2068 10 B26
8 Nguyen, Renee 2326 2067 17 A25
9 Law, Mila 2313 2064 188 A26
10 Cho, Jacey 2286 2036 273 A26
11 Wang, Chloe 2259 2004 31 A26
12 Dymar, Anna 2253 1999 3 B26
13 Chen, Alina 2240 1989 28 B26
14 Lee, Eden 2247 1989 77 B26
15 Wang, Chantal 2203 1949 25 A25
16 Kane, Alexa 2186 1916 19 B25
17 Ramey, Alexa 2167 1897 21 B26
18 Ning, Miranda 2130 1878 14 B25
19 Burks, Madison 2103 1841 46 B26
20 Miyoshi, Kylie 2042 1770 43 E26
21 Zhong, Evelyn 2022 1759 - B25
22 Ciobanu, Celine 2004 1735 63 C26
23 Zhu, Una 2000 1729 26 C25
24 Kakani, Aditi 1963 1712 58 C26
25 Arulkumar, Lashia 1960 1707 19 C26
26 Cai, Melody 1997 1706 38 C26
27 Li, Xier 1948 1688 31 C26
28 Kouame, Candice 1934 1668 11 A25
29 Kim, Vivian 1916 1664 24 C26
30 Yan, Ximei 1921 1661 - C25
31 Wang, Olivia 1966 1655 100 B26
32 Lee, Kate 1900 1648 38 C26
33 Hale, Reagan 1893 1638 17 C26
34 Feng, Esther 1860 1574 16 D26
35 Pekker, Adel 1890 1574 76 C26
36 jiang, chenxi 1820 1570 113 C26
37 Operario, Sofia Francesca 1903 1559 53 E25
38 Erisman, Gabriella 1836 1555 8 C26
39 Sonku, Mira 1820 1551 52 C26
40 Edgar, Koko 1831 1551 91 D26
41 Tian, Victoria 1820 1549 48 D26
42 Jiang, Alexandra 1859 1535 107 C26
43 Ju, Jennifer 1782 1532 12 B26
44 Zhang, Jane 1773 1522 - D25
45 Pan, Sara 2835 1517 - U
46 Howard, Katherine 1768 1512 58 B25
47 cho, Anya 1782 1501 14 D26

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.