Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Women's EpeeBirth Year 2012

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Xu, Yvette, Zixuan 2830 2541 117 A26
2 Habek, Sophia 2795 2528 11 A25
3 Adyanthaya, Anika 2533 2281 119 A26
4 Dhaiya, Tanya 2436 2182 7 A25
5 Hernasa, Anna 2413 2159 53 B26
6 Nguyen, Renee 2330 2071 30 A25
7 Pei, Claire 2322 2069 115 A26
8 Chi, Zoe 2309 2056 31 B26
9 Wang, Chloe 2261 2007 187 A26
10 Dymar, Anna 2261 2006 7 B26
11 Cho, Jacey 2226 1973 321 A26
12 Chen, Alina 2210 1961 38 B25
13 Law, Mila 2213 1961 158 A26
14 Lee, Eden 2205 1941 107 B26
15 Wang, Chantal 2196 1939 23 A25
16 Kane, Alexa 2165 1894 16 B25
17 Ramey, Alexa 2157 1884 22 B26
18 Ning, Miranda 2120 1869 14 B25
19 Burks, Madison 2069 1803 4 D26
20 Miyoshi, Kylie 2042 1770 43 E26
21 Zhong, Evelyn 2022 1759 - B25
22 Ciobanu, Celine 2018 1747 182 C26
23 Kakani, Aditi 1983 1731 38 C26
24 Zhu, Una 1995 1723 50 C25
25 Kim, Vivian 1952 1700 65 C26
26 Cai, Melody 1990 1693 16 E26
27 Li, Xier 1954 1692 164 C26
28 Arulkumar, Lashia 1931 1679 15 C26
29 Kouame, Candice 1944 1678 3 A25
30 Yan, Ximei 1921 1661 - C25
31 Wang, Olivia 1963 1647 122 B26
32 Lee, Kate 1875 1623 6 D26
33 Hale, Reagan 1860 1603 27 C26
34 Feng, Esther 1885 1592 45 D26
35 Pekker, Adel 1897 1575 79 C26
36 Erisman, Gabriella 1854 1568 10 C26
37 Operario, Sofia Francesca 1915 1567 86 E25
38 Ding, Xiaoxi 2575 1553 1553 C25
39 Tian, Victoria 1825 1549 120 D26
40 Ju, Jennifer 1791 1542 87 B26
41 Howard, Katherine 1794 1537 29 B25
42 Zhang, Jane 1773 1522 3 D25
43 Edgar, Koko 1807 1517 75 D26
44 Pan, Sara 2835 1517 - U
45 cho, Anya 1796 1515 38 D26
46 Sonku, Mira 1786 1513 66 C25
47 jiang, chenxi 1754 1505 76 C26

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.