Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Women's EpeeBirth Year 2012

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Xu, Yvette, Zixuan 2865 2583 171 A26
2 Habek, Sophia 2771 2507 10 A25
3 Adyanthaya, Anika 2618 2367 174 A26
4 Dhaiya, Tanya 2459 2206 7 A26
5 Hernasa, Anna 2436 2183 57 A26
6 Pei, Claire 2322 2068 70 A26
7 Nguyen, Renee 2326 2067 7 A25
8 Chi, Zoe 2318 2064 21 B26
9 Cho, Jacey 2286 2036 278 A26
10 Law, Mila 2263 2013 137 A26
11 Chen, Alina 2257 2006 59 B26
12 Wang, Chloe 2259 2004 105 A26
13 Dymar, Anna 2253 1999 3 B26
14 Wang, Chantal 2223 1967 59 A25
15 Lee, Eden 2175 1915 2 B26
16 Kane, Alexa 2174 1904 16 B25
17 Ramey, Alexa 2167 1897 21 B26
18 Ning, Miranda 2131 1879 1 B25
19 Burks, Madison 2103 1841 46 B26
20 Miyoshi, Kylie 2042 1770 43 E26
21 Zhong, Evelyn 2022 1759 - B25
22 Ciobanu, Celine 2004 1735 126 C26
23 Zhu, Una 2000 1729 26 C25
24 Kakani, Aditi 1959 1708 50 C26
25 Arulkumar, Lashia 1960 1707 45 C26
26 Cai, Melody 1991 1698 29 C26
27 Li, Xier 1948 1688 31 C26
28 Kouame, Candice 1934 1668 11 A25
29 Kim, Vivian 1916 1664 45 C26
30 Yan, Ximei 1921 1661 - C25
31 Lee, Kate 1908 1656 46 C26
32 Wang, Olivia 1966 1655 100 B26
33 Hale, Reagan 1893 1638 17 C26
34 Feng, Esther 1860 1574 16 D26
35 Pekker, Adel 1886 1570 74 C26
36 Erisman, Gabriella 1841 1560 4 C26
37 Operario, Sofia Francesca 1903 1559 53 E25
38 Sonku, Mira 1820 1551 57 C26
39 Edgar, Koko 1831 1551 90 D26
40 Tian, Victoria 1820 1549 48 D26
41 jiang, chenxi 1789 1539 88 C26
42 Jiang, Alexandra 1859 1535 193 C26
43 Ju, Jennifer 1783 1533 29 B26
44 Howard, Katherine 1784 1528 42 B25
45 Zhang, Jane 1773 1522 - D25
46 Pan, Sara 2835 1517 - U
47 cho, Anya 1782 1501 1 D26

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.