Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Women's EpeeBirth Year 2012

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Xu, Yvette, Zixuan 2832 2552 124 A26
2 Habek, Sophia 2752 2489 28 A25
3 Adyanthaya, Anika 2623 2369 145 A26
4 Dhaiya, Tanya 2510 2256 62 A26
5 Law, Mila 2463 2213 295 A26
6 Hernasa, Anna 2449 2196 52 A26
7 Nguyen, Renee 2422 2166 97 A26
8 Pei, Claire 2380 2122 82 A26
9 Chi, Zoe 2299 2046 28 B26
10 Cho, Jacey 2294 2042 162 A26
11 Wang, Chloe 2283 2028 55 A26
12 Dymar, Anna 2256 2004 35 A26
13 Chen, Alina 2250 2000 39 B26
14 Lee, Eden 2242 1984 43 A26
15 Ning, Miranda 2179 1929 46 B26
16 Wang, Chantal 2168 1915 26 A25
17 Kane, Alexa 2167 1902 9 B26
18 Ramey, Alexa 2167 1897 21 B26
19 Ding, Xiaoxi 2392 1853 1853 B26
20 Burks, Madison 2077 1819 13 B26
21 Arulkumar, Lashia 2046 1794 58 B26
22 Miyoshi, Kylie 2042 1770 - E26
23 Li, Xier 2025 1768 105 B26
24 Zhong, Evelyn 2022 1759 - B25
25 Zhu, Una 1997 1732 23 C25
26 Kakani, Aditi 1972 1722 65 C26
27 Ciobanu, Celine 1986 1719 1 C26
28 Cai, Melody 1999 1712 55 C26
29 Edgar, Koko 1982 1711 210 B26
30 Kouame, Candice 1953 1687 9 A25
31 Yan, Ximei 1921 1661 - C25
32 Lee, Kate 1900 1648 45 C26
33 Erisman, Gabriella 1911 1641 36 B26
34 Wang, Olivia 1948 1640 14 B26
35 Hale, Reagan 1882 1629 12 C26
36 Kim, Vivian 1856 1606 57 C26
37 jiang, chenxi 1852 1605 114 C26
38 Feng, Esther 1876 1596 50 C26
39 Pekker, Adel 1890 1574 13 C26
40 Jiang, Alexandra 1877 1572 113 B26
41 Sonku, Mira 1830 1567 34 C26
42 Operario, Sofia Francesca 1903 1559 53 E25
43 Allievi, Simone 1812 1558 124 C26
44 Tian, Victoria 1818 1550 1 D26
45 Ju, Jennifer 1798 1548 40 B26
46 Zhang, Jane 1773 1522 - D25
47 Pan, Sara 2835 1517 - U
48 Howard, Katherine 1768 1512 44 B25
49 cho, Anya 1782 1501 8 D26

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.