Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Women's EpeeBirth Year 2007

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Xiao, Ruien 3862 3588 - A25
2 Korfonta, Jolie 3515 3251 71 A26
3 Gajjala, Sharika 3438 3172 11 A25
4 Xuan, Nicole 3349 3083 - A25
5 Yang, Alisa 3245 2984 53 A26
6 Zigalo, Elizabeth 3235 2982 8 A26
7 Lee, Natasha 3160 2902 24 A24
8 Zhang, Victoria 3095 2841 21 A26
9 Yu, Nicole 3080 2820 - A25
10 Kim, Zoe 3075 2816 48 A25
11 Bezuglaya, Varvara 2992 2735 28 A23
12 Nguyen, Tallulah 2956 2704 - A24
13 Hafeez, Hania 2940 2684 - A24
14 Feng, Ge 2920 2668 22 A25
15 Reid, Anousheh 2903 2650 - A22
16 Peck, Maia 2838 2579 31 A25
17 Swenson, Nikita 2817 2562 33 B25
18 Xiong, Angelica 2820 2556 18 A26
19 Mueller, Emma 2790 2537 - A24
20 Zanga, Kaitlyn 2799 2534 43 A24
21 Potapenko, Margarita 2790 2528 41 A23
22 Dubeau, Alexa 2998 2512 16 B25
23 Elston, Sophia 2762 2503 74 A26
24 Lin, Elaine 2754 2498 1 A26
25 Li, Yuhe 2978 2454 - E22
26 You, Emily 2691 2438 - A24
27 Randleman, Teresa 2689 2426 - A23
28 Zherebchevska, Veronika 2676 2420 - B24
29 Li, Fei 2655 2397 63 A26
30 Furman, Maria 2618 2361 77 A25
31 Kim, Jayna 2614 2352 - B22
32 Mun, Brianna 2602 2348 - A24
33 Hafeez, Hiba 2599 2342 - A24
34 Gujja, Misha 2513 2256 - B22
35 Park, Judy 2588 2251 - E22
36 Daher, Yasmine 2597 2219 - B25
37 Salistra, Emilia 2466 2201 26 A26
38 Senyuva, Su 2478 2194 - B24
39 Shu, Youshan 2442 2192 - A24
40 Pinnamaneni, Drithi 2434 2173 - B23
41 Kosanovich, Jillian 3429 2171 - D25
42 Zhang, Yunjia 3246 2138 - U
43 Mandap, Svetlanna 2392 2109 - B23
44 Pullara, Ashley 2418 2106 - D26
45 Li, Suri 2364 2083 - C26
46 Geva, Eliana 2357 2077 48 B26
47 Liu, Baihan 2354 2026 29 C23
48 Donges, Anna 2290 2024 7 C24
49 Lewis, Rachel 2272 2012 18 B26

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.