Strength Ranking

Women's Epee, Birth Year 2011

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate* Cons. Est.* 		180-day
Trend		 Rating
1 Lv, Xi er 3769 2735 - B25
2 Neelam, Navya 2813 2555 41 A25
3 Franger, Macy 2780 2521 96 A25
4 Hankins, Morgan 2692 2441 60 A25
5 Abuelfutuh, Sama 2627 2370 49 A25
6 Xu, Serena 2589 2335 38 A25
7 Qi, Julieanne 2560 2308 82 A25
8 Wu, Michelle 2501 2250 140 A25
9 Lee, Gloria 2487 2232 26 C25
10 Xu, Sunia (Tai Yang) 2467 2182 167 A25
11 Chernis, Liah 2416 2150 42 B25
12 Kropp, Anne 2302 2050 25 U
13 Xu, Jessica 2304 2049 4 B24
14 Li, Alice 2305 2049 77 B25
15 Holden, Helena 2292 2035 43 B25
16 Talandzevicius, Sophia 2282 2018 37 B24
17 Aneziokoro, Zahra 2267 2008 117 A25
18 Merriman, Rie 2246 1988 119 A25
19 Ma, Sophie 2247 1979 1 B25
20 Dobrosavljević, Kalina 2243 1931 199 C25
21 Tismensky, Abigail 2184 1922 11 B24
22 Zhao, Isabel 3335 1922 - U
23 Borotko, Katerina 2159 1908 44 B25
24 Wong, Sydney 2157 1900 61 B25
25 DeSantis-Ibanez, Elena 2148 1895 7 U
26 Mandap, Alessandra 2192 1891 36 C25
27 Mohan, Riya 2153 1888 70 B25
28 Jordan, Zoe 2176 1868 2 E25
29 Pacheco, Carys 2224 1858 291 C25
30 Gierat-Katz, Izabella 2115 1856 46 C25
31 Fischbein, Quinley 2076 1829 54 C25
32 Robles, Claudia 2184 1821 10 E25
33 Voskov, Olivia 2060 1800 43 C25
34 Tam, Connie 2067 1797 58 C25
35 Petroff, Eva 2042 1786 76 B25
36 Song, Sunny 2282 1784 67 D24
37 Wang, Cecilia 2009 1754 34 D24
38 Yu, Tai Zhen 2749 1746 - U
39 Sun, Karolyn 2000 1740 102 B25
40 Burt, Emmalyne Grace 1985 1710 96 C25
41 Kent, Laurel 1981 1665 60 C25
42 Yu, Julie 2495 1660 331 U
43 Wong, Angelina 1932 1653 3 D25
44 Zhao, Emma 1905 1645 47 E24
45 Desai, Ela 1920 1636 87 D25
46 Ekshtut, Leah 2069 1634 122 C25
47 Zayko, Aveline 2009 1612 4 D25
48 Zhao, Yanning 1864 1609 67 E25
49 JeanBaptiste, Lauren 2289 1602 8 U
50 Burrows, Beatrice 1918 1562 34 D24
51 Ordorica, Abra 1877 1555 334 D25
52 Budman, Ava 1806 1518 1 D24
53 Lee, Adelynn 1786 1509 45 E24

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.