Strength Ranking

Women's Epee, Birth Year 2011

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate* Cons. Est.* 		180-day
Trend		 Rating
1 Lv, Xi er 3769 2735 - B25
2 Neelam, Navya 2820 2561 56 A25
3 Hankins, Morgan 2779 2528 108 A25
4 Franger, Macy 2763 2506 77 A25
5 Abuelfutuh, Sama 2684 2427 99 A25
6 Qi, Julieanne 2603 2350 93 A25
7 Wu, Michelle 2579 2329 187 A25
8 Xu, Serena 2573 2320 29 A25
9 Lee, Gloria 2520 2265 24 B25
10 Xu, Sunia (Tai Yang) 2519 2241 135 A25
11 Chernis, Liah 2487 2223 125 A25
12 Kropp, Anne 2320 2061 21 U
13 Li, Alice 2308 2050 48 B25
14 Holden, Helena 2291 2036 25 B25
15 Talandzevicius, Sophia 2294 2031 20 B24
16 Aneziokoro, Zahra 2289 2031 120 A25
17 Xu, Jessica 2275 2021 30 B25
18 Merriman, Rie 2240 1982 44 A25
19 Ma, Sophie 2226 1958 5 B25
20 Tismensky, Abigail 2198 1938 19 B24
21 Dobrosavljević, Kalina 2242 1938 119 C25
22 Wong, Sydney 2179 1922 32 B25
23 Borotko, Katerina 2172 1921 1 B25
24 Mohan, Riya 2149 1886 90 B25
25 Fischbein, Quinley 2124 1875 90 C25
26 Jordan, Zoe 2170 1874 8 D25
27 Gierat-Katz, Izabella 2130 1874 52 B25
28 DeSantis-Ibanez, Elena 2112 1862 41 U
29 Pacheco, Carys 2224 1858 15 C25
30 Mandap, Alessandra 2146 1851 20 C25
31 Voskov, Olivia 2071 1813 63 C25
32 Robles, Claudia 2150 1797 18 E25
33 Petroff, Eva 2033 1777 48 B25
34 Tam, Connie 2037 1769 10 C25
35 Ekshtut, Leah 2147 1764 130 B25
36 Sun, Karolyn 2023 1763 101 B25
37 Wang, Cecilia 2009 1754 33 D24
38 Song, Sunny 2225 1751 5 D24
39 Yu, Tai Zhen 2749 1746 - U
40 Burt, Emmalyne Grace 1985 1710 137 C25
41 Zayko, Aveline 2044 1681 60 D25
42 Zhao, Isabel 2596 1677 245 D25
43 Kent, Laurel 1971 1664 59 C25
44 Yu, Julie 2495 1660 331 U
45 Zhao, Emma 1914 1656 9 E25
46 Wong, Angelina 1932 1653 10 D25
47 Desai, Ela 1920 1636 87 D25
48 Liu, Chloe 2085 1606 575 C25
49 Zhao, Yanning 1848 1594 40 E25
50 Ordorica, Abra 1903 1593 274 C25
51 Klausz, Izabella 2004 1582 493 D25
52 Burrows, Beatrice 1900 1576 31 D25
53 Budman, Ava 1811 1529 11 D24
54 Kong, Mila 1835 1511 82 D25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.