Strength Ranking

Women's Epee, Birth Year 2011

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Lv, Xi er 3769 2735 - B25
2 Neelam, Navya 2820 2561 56 A25
3 Franger, Macy 2780 2521 92 A25
4 Hankins, Morgan 2707 2456 74 A25
5 Abuelfutuh, Sama 2657 2400 68 A25
6 Xu, Serena 2584 2329 15 A25
7 Qi, Julieanne 2560 2308 54 A25
8 Wu, Michelle 2552 2301 154 A25
9 Lee, Gloria 2487 2232 14 C25
10 Xu, Sunia (Tai Yang) 2467 2182 76 A25
11 Chernis, Liah 2446 2181 73 B25
12 Kropp, Anne 2320 2061 34 U
13 Xu, Jessica 2291 2037 6 B24
14 Li, Alice 2285 2030 38 B25
15 Holden, Helena 2285 2029 18 B25
16 Talandzevicius, Sophia 2282 2018 31 B24
17 Aneziokoro, Zahra 2267 2008 107 A25
18 Merriman, Rie 2246 1988 97 A25
19 Ma, Sophie 2247 1979 16 B25
20 Dobrosavljević, Kalina 2247 1934 179 C25
21 Tismensky, Abigail 2184 1922 17 B24
22 Borotko, Katerina 2159 1908 24 B25
23 Wong, Sydney 2157 1900 38 B25
24 Mohan, Riya 2151 1887 52 B25
25 DeSantis-Ibanez, Elena 2127 1875 24 U
26 Jordan, Zoe 2170 1874 8 E25
27 Mandap, Alessandra 2156 1860 56 C25
28 Pacheco, Carys 2224 1858 33 C25
29 Fischbein, Quinley 2105 1854 82 C25
30 Gierat-Katz, Izabella 2107 1850 25 C25
31 Zhao, Isabel 2971 1844 78 U
32 Voskov, Olivia 2060 1800 50 C25
33 Tam, Connie 2067 1797 18 C25
34 Robles, Claudia 2150 1797 14 E25
35 Ekshtut, Leah 2183 1793 159 B25
36 Petroff, Eva 2042 1786 72 B25
37 Song, Sunny 2246 1764 8 D24
38 Wang, Cecilia 2009 1754 33 D24
39 Yu, Tai Zhen 2749 1746 - U
40 Sun, Karolyn 2006 1745 127 B25
41 Burt, Emmalyne Grace 1985 1710 96 C25
42 Zayko, Aveline 2044 1681 65 D25
43 Kent, Laurel 1986 1679 74 C25
44 Yu, Julie 2495 1660 331 U
45 Zhao, Emma 1914 1656 12 E25
46 Wong, Angelina 1932 1653 10 D25
47 Desai, Ela 1920 1636 87 D25
48 Zhao, Yanning 1869 1613 58 E25
49 JeanBaptiste, Lauren 2289 1602 8 U
50 Burrows, Beatrice 1924 1580 35 D25
51 Liu, Chloe 2068 1552 521 C25
52 Ordorica, Abra 1858 1541 274 D25
53 Budman, Ava 1814 1531 12 D24
54 Lee, Kaitlyn 1793 1506 17 C24

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.