Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Shoman, Jenna | 3477 | 3184 | 72 | A23 |
2 | Freedman, Janna | 3093 | 2824 | 44 | A23 |
3 | Hild, Nisha | 2928 | 2665 | 26 | A23 |
4 | Engelman-Sanz, Madeline | 2926 | 2664 | 68 | A23 |
5 | Mika, Veronica | 2911 | 2656 | 99 | A23 |
6 | Duckett, Madison | 2909 | 2648 | 8 | A22 |
7 | Yang, Ashley | 2794 | 2542 | 36 | B23 |
8 | Erikson, Kira | 2781 | 2531 | 68 | A23 |
9 | Procaccini, Ashten | 2875 | 2512 | - | U |
10 | Shi, Cathleen | 2765 | 2512 | - | A23 |
11 | Shearer, Natalie | 2754 | 2502 | 47 | A23 |
12 | Li, Amanda | 2750 | 2498 | 227 | A21 |
13 | Chin, Sophia | 2747 | 2491 | 104 | B23 |
14 | Yang, Angelina LeLe | 2741 | 2489 | 53 | A23 |
15 | Chen, Ashley | 2709 | 2457 | 138 | A23 |
16 | Vadasz, Ibla | 2686 | 2436 | 123 | A22 |
17 | Alcebar, Kayla | 2677 | 2426 | 18 | B22 |
18 | Wiggers, Susan | 2667 | 2419 | 45 | A22 |
19 | Sourimto, Valeria | 2655 | 2403 | 7 | B23 |
20 | Johnson, Lydia | 2624 | 2368 | 79 | C23 |
21 | Yuan, Greta | 2539 | 2288 | 22 | B23 |
22 | Ligh, Erenei | 2524 | 2276 | 17 | C23 |
23 | Wei, Vivian | 2521 | 2269 | 63 | B22 |
24 | Hung, Anna | 2524 | 2265 | 16 | B22 |
25 | Balakumaran, Maya | 2510 | 2262 | 31 | B22 |
26 | Nathanson, Sammy | 2509 | 2255 | 75 | A22 |
27 | Lee, Sophia | 2488 | 2233 | 6 | A23 |
28 | Ferreira, Alejandra | 2487 | 2227 | - | C23 |
29 | Sinha, Anika | 2450 | 2204 | 33 | B23 |
30 | Shtrevensky, Maria | 2559 | 2204 | 90 | B23 |
31 | Barnovitz, Maya | 2410 | 2157 | 58 | B23 |
32 | peng, Florella | 2422 | 2149 | - | U |
33 | Chang, Audrey | 2400 | 2146 | - | C23 |
34 | Graff, Sophie | 2354 | 2105 | 26 | C22 |
35 | Mansperger, Leena | 2351 | 2100 | 68 | B22 |
36 | Altheimer, Holly | 2875 | 2084 | - | E23 |
37 | Tong, Jessie | 2334 | 2083 | 16 | B22 |
38 | Mulagari, Sadhika | 2309 | 2059 | 7 | A22 |
39 | Obradovic, Ana | 2303 | 2051 | 11 | C23 |
40 | Fan, Grace | 2285 | 2032 | 64 | C23 |
41 | Scott, Eve | 2257 | 2006 | 28 | B23 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athetes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.