North Shore Fencers Club - Great Neck, NY, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZAGORUIKO Ivan | V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 2 | SANDERS Ian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | TSINIS Alex Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | AGAON Shawn | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | SHEN Max | V V V V V | V V | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 6 | FULLER George | V V V D | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 7 | BEDOR William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | KOKENGE Clark | V D V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 9 | ISAAC Joseph | V V V V | V V | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 10 | WU Joseph | V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 11 | KOKENGE Reid | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 12 | CAI Brian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | AGAON Ethan | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | HE Lawrence | V V | V V | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 15 | BELL Jack | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 16 | SHA Michael | D V V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 17 | GAO Tiger Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | ANDERSON Brendan | V V V V V V | D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 19 | ZHANG Jie | V D V V V | V | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 20 | GAO Daniel | V V D V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 21 | JIN Owen | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | CHANG Che Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | DECKER Tristan | D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | WU Jonathan | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 25 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel | V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 26 | XIE Brandon | D V D V | V | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 27 | KUMAR Anitya | D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 28 | SHREM Samuel | D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 29 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | D D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | D V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 31 | KARASIN Mark | V V D D | V | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 32 | WU Colin | D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | CHU Brandon | D V D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 34 | KIM Dylan | V D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 35 | LIU Jeremiah W. | D V V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 36 | KUNITSA Dmitry | V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 37 | NABAVI Matthew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | THAKUR Om | D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 37 | DURKIN Tristan | V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 40 | JOSEPH Willem | V D D V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 | |
| 41 | ARAVIND Athreya | D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 42 | SINGH Jaysukh | D V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 43 | LOPEZ-SIMPSON Victor | D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 44 | PALIWODA Nicholas | V D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 45 | DACKO Alexander | V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 46 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | D D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 47 | FENG Du | D D D V D V | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 | |
| 48 | CHOU Benson | V V D D | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
| 49 | RITTMAN Zacc | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 50 | KOKENGE Chad | D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 51 | ZOU Xianyang | D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 52 | BEAUCHESNE Rudy | D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 53 | HU Robert | V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 54 | MARTINEZ Joshua | V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 55 | BAMBRA Taranjot | V D D D D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
| 56 | BYUN Kevin | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 57 | GARCIA Yago | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 58 | GAO Xiaojiang "George" | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 59 | WANG Haixu Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 60 | SHAPIRO Samuel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 61 | JONELEIT Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 62 | LUNIEVICZ Joseph | D D D D D D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 | |
| 63 | HO Ivan | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 64 | RUPP Keegan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.