North Shore Fencers Club - Great Neck, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZAGORUIKO Ivan | V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | AGAON Shawn | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | SHEN Max | V V V V V | V V | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 6 | FULLER George | V V V D | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 8 | KOKENGE Clark | V D V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 9 | ISAAC Joseph | V V V V | V V | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 10 | WU Joseph | V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 11 | KOKENGE Reid | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 13 | AGAON Ethan | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | HE Lawrence | V V | V V | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 15 | BELL Jack | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 16 | SHA Michael | D V V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 18 | ANDERSON Brendan | V V V V V V | D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 19 | ZHANG Jie | V D V V V | V | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 20 | GAO Daniel | V V D V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 21 | JIN Owen | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | DECKER Tristan | D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | WU Jonathan | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 25 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel | V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 26 | XIE Brandon | D V D V | V | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 27 | KUMAR Anitya | D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 28 | SHREM Samuel | D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 29 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | D D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | D V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 32 | WU Colin | D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | CHU Brandon | D V D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 34 | KIM Dylan | V D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 35 | LIU Jeremiah W. | D V V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 36 | KUNITSA Dmitry | V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 37 | THAKUR Om | D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 37 | DURKIN Tristan | V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 40 | JOSEPH Willem | V D D V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 | |
| 41 | ARAVIND Athreya | D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 42 | SINGH Jaysukh | D V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 43 | LOPEZ-SIMPSON Victor | D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 44 | PALIWODA Nicholas | V D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 45 | DACKO Alexander | V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 46 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | D D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 47 | FENG Du | D D D V D V | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 | |
| 48 | CHOU Benson | V V D D | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
| 49 | RITTMAN Zacc | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 50 | KOKENGE Chad | D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 51 | ZOU Xianyang | D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 52 | BEAUCHESNE Rudy | D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 53 | HU Robert | V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 54 | MARTINEZ Joshua | V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 55 | BAMBRA Taranjot | V D D D D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
| 56 | BYUN Kevin | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 57 | GARCIA Yago | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 58 | GAO Xiaojiang "George" | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 62 | LUNIEVICZ Joseph | D D D D D D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 | |
| 63 | HO Ivan | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.