Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LO Jake | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
2 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | V V D V V V | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | LIN Kyran | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
3 | FU Leon | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
5 | ZHENG Haoran | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
6 | KIM Nathan | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
7 | DOWDELL Riley | V D V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
8 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | D D V V D V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
9 | WANG Devon | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
10 | KIM Sullivan | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
11 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
12 | DRIBIN Ezra | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
13 | MULCAHY Olaf | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
14 | QUITORIANO Matthew | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
15 | GINZBURG Adam | V V V D V D | V V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
16 | SINHA Zaan | V V D V D D | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
17 | LEE Inwoo | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
18 | BAZHENOV Anthony | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
19 | GAO Chaney C. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
20 | CASTELLY Luke | V V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
21 | DAO Alexander | V V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
22 | KNUDSEN Travis | V V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
23 | CHOI Kaiden I. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
24 | CHEN Bailey | D V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | ZHU Eric | D V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
26 | GAO Zachary | V D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
27 | HIGGINS Calvin | V V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
28 | KIM Jayden | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
29 | BARG Jonathan | V D D D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
30 | LOFTUS Luca | D V D D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
31 | TANDOC Noah | D V D D D D | V V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
32 | FERRIERE Joshua | D D D D D D | V V D | 3.8 | 0 | -3.8 |
33 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | V V V V V V | D | 2.7 | 6 | +3.3 |
34 | KIM Ian | V V V V D V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
35 | WANG Owen | D V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
36 | PAK Elliot | V V V D V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
37 | LIU Yikun | V V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
38 | PRAKASH Hari | V V D D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
39 | JU Hanul | V V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
40 | HOGE William P. | V D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
41 | MIAO Kunqi | D V V D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
42 | MEHROTRA Neel | V V D V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
43 | CHEN Zhengyang | V V V D V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
43 | DONAHUE Lake | D V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
45 | KAO Yishane | V D D V V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
46 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | D V V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
47 | XIONG Aaron | D D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
48 | HERNDON Liam | D V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
49 | MENDOZA Zander | V D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
50 | YU Austin | D V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
51 | CHEN Josh | D D V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
52 | SU Oliver | D V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
53 | SEO Shawn | D D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
54 | KIM Teddy | D D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
55 | MORALES Esteban | D D V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
56 | RAHMAN Yousef | D D V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
57 | HALL Gabriel | V V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
58 | DE LA TORRE PEREZ Jesus Adiel | V D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
59 | CHANG Andrew | D D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
60 | MAJAM Brandon Audie | D D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
61 | LIANG Eric | D D V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
62 | TUSANTOSO McKenzie | D D D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
63 | LAU Christian | V D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
64 | ARMITAGE Liam | D D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
65 | MARTIN Charles | D D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
66 | NUGENT Jack | V V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
67 | DENISON Declan | D D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
68 | OLSON christopher | D D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
69 | TAI Edison | V D D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
70 | MAXU Tiger | D V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
71 | NG Biwon | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
72 | LI zerong | V D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
73 | LEE JiYuen | V D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
74 | WANG Joey | D D D D V D | D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
75 | HINTON Evan | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
76 | ANDERSON Kai | D V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
77 | LEE Damien | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
78 | JAIN Samyak | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
79 | GOROZA Eric | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
80 | LIU Yueri | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
80 | SIM Ian | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
80 | KIM Justin | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
83 | PERKINS Jaray | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
84 | ABELAR Jacob | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
85 | GUO Woody | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
86 | RAHMAN Zayd | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
87 | KIM Remington | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
88 | BAXTER Max | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
89 | RODRIGUEZ Ripley | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
90 | CHANG Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
91 | LEE Aidan | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.