SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | YU Vinni | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
2 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
3 | BRUK Peter J. | V D V V D | V V V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
3 | SERVELLO Augusto | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
5 | KWON Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
7 | MITCHELL Philip D. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
8 | NAGER Noah | V V V V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
9 | LEE Aidan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
10 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
11 | DAI Jonathan T. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
12 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
12 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
14 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | SONG Bryan | V D V V D | V V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
16 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V D D D D | V V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
17 | JIANG Owen | V V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
18 | WELCH Kyle J. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
19 | AHN Jun | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
20 | ZHENG Alan H. | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
21 | BUERGIN Aidan | D V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
22 | LEE Jacob J | V V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
23 | BAE Kevin | V V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
24 | RUSADZE Nickolas | V D V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | LI Richard | V D V V V D | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
26 | KIM Yonjae | D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
27 | LE Vyn A. | D V V D V | V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
28 | SHA Yi Peng | V V D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
29 | LIN Richard W. | D V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
30 | KLOTZ Isaiah | V V D V D D | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
31 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | V V V D D D | V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
32 | PYO Michael M. | D V D D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
33 | DU Samuel R. | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
34 | DESANDO Michael R. | V V V V D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
35 | WU Alexander | V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
36 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
37 | DOBBINS Evan W. | D V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
38 | LI Eric | V V V D D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
39 | ZOBEL Eric H. | V D V V D V | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
40 | CHAN Tyler | V V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
41 | COZINE Owen N. | V D V V V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
42 | TSAY Jeremy M. | D V D V V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
43 | LINALDI Alberto | D D V V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
44 | ZHEN Ethan | D D V V V V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
45 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
46 | GONG Benjamin | V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
47 | PO Oliver | D D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
48 | LU Yikai | V D V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
49 | TAHOUN Mostafa | V D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
50 | TEMPLE Jackson | V V D D V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
51 | KLOSTERMANN Max | D D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
52 | GAO William | V D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
53 | SEZER Kaya | D D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
54 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
55 | LIU Eric Y. | V D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
56 | LIN James G. | D V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
57 | STRAYER Andrew | D D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
58 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | V V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
59 | BROWN Alexander R. | V D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
60 | TIKHAEV Alexander | D D D V D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
61 | DAUM Charlie | V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
62 | ZHAI Jeffrey | D D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
62 | SICHITIU Alexander | D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
64 | WANG Gerald Y. | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
65 | TSAI Max W. | D V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
66 | KEE Andrew L. | D D V D V | 2.0 | 2 | - | |
67 | WANG Michael | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
68 | LEE Jonah | D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
69 | EVANS Aidan | V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
70 | LANG Dong Lin | V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
71 | ORLOV Dmitriy | D V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
72 | KNIZHNIK David | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
73 | SHAO Eric | D D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
73 | BADLANI Dev | D V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
75 | MURPHY Damian J. | D D D V V D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
76 | AMRANI David | D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
77 | LEWIS Akhil | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
78 | DAVIS Christopher M. | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
79 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
80 | YOON DYLAN | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
81 | JIN Dennis H. | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
81 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
81 | WU Michael | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
84 | HUANG Eythan | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
85 | MATSAKH Philip | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
86 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
87 | REZA Farazi | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
88 | TSAI William | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
89 | MENG Zhaoyi | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
90 | RUSSO Frank | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
91 | COTLAR Andrew D. | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
92 | MURDOCH Walter | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.