SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YU Vinni | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 2 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 33% | 63% |
| 3 | BRUK Peter J. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 3 | SERVELLO Augusto | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 12% |
| 5 | KWON Ethan | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 6 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 7 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 12% |
| 8 | NAGER Noah | - | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 9 | LEE Aidan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 10 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% |
| 11 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 12 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 12 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% | |
| 14 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
| 15 | SONG Bryan | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 17 | JIANG Owen | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | WELCH Kyle J. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 51% |
| 19 | AHN Jun | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 20 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 21 | BUERGIN Aidan | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | LEE Jacob J | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | BAE Kevin | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
| 24 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 25 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 26 | KIM Yonjae | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 27 | LE Vyn A. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | SHA Yi Peng | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 29 | LIN Richard W. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 30 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 32 | PYO Michael M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 9% |
| 33 | DU Samuel R. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | DESANDO Michael R. | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 10% | |
| 35 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 36 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | |
| 37 | DOBBINS Evan W. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 49% | 26% | 3% |
| 38 | LI Eric | - | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
| 39 | ZOBEL Eric H. | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 48% | 13% |
| 40 | CHAN Tyler | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
| 41 | COZINE Owen N. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 42 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 43 | LINALDI Alberto | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% |
| 44 | ZHEN Ethan | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 46 | GONG Benjamin | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 47 | PO Oliver | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 48 | LU Yikai | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 49 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 2% | 18% | 45% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | TEMPLE Jackson | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 51 | KLOSTERMANN Max | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 52 | GAO William | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | SEZER Kaya | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 54 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 55 | LIU Eric Y. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 56 | LIN James G. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | STRAYER Andrew | - | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 58 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 59 | BROWN Alexander R. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 53% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | DAUM Charlie | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 62 | SICHITIU Alexander | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 64 | WANG Gerald Y. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 65 | TSAI Max W. | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | KEE Andrew L. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 67 | WANG Michael | 11% | 41% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 68 | LEE Jonah | 9% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | EVANS Aidan | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 70 | LANG Dong Lin | 1% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 71 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 7% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | KNIZHNIK David | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 73 | SHAO Eric | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | BADLANI Dev | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 75 | MURPHY Damian J. | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | AMRANI David | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 77 | LEWIS Akhil | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 79 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | YOON DYLAN | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | JIN Dennis H. | 10% | 57% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 81 | WU Michael | 18% | 50% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 84 | HUANG Eythan | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 85 | MATSAKH Philip | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 46% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 87 | REZA Farazi | 22% | 50% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 88 | TSAI William | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 89 | MENG Zhaoyi | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 90 | RUSSO Frank | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 91 | COTLAR Andrew D. | 3% | 21% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 92 | MURDOCH Walter | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.