ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BAE Kevin | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
2 | BING Charles | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% |
3 | LI Eric | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
3 | LANG Dong Lin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
5 | LEWIS Akhil | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 49% | 29% |
6 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% |
7 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
8 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
9 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
10 | SHIN Joshua J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 43% | 7% |
11 | LIN Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 47% | 36% |
12 | SIMA Congyu Josh | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
13 | LI Arvin | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% |
14 | HE Xiangrui | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 6% |
15 | LEE Jonah | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
16 | ORLOV Dmitriy | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
17 | LI Matthew | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 13% | |
18 | LIN James G. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
19 | LIU Derek | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
20 | SONG Bryan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
21 | YOON Dylan | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 27% | 4% |
22 | LIGOS Alex M. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
23 | ACHILOV Sayid | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% |
24 | DAVIDSON Elliot | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
25 | LAURICELLA Douglas | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
26 | CHENG Jonathan | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% | |
27 | WANG Mason | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
28 | MILLER Jordan | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
29 | XU Ethan | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | LEE Eugene | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
31 | LI Ayren | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
32 | LI Aaron | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% | - |
33 | TJON Calum | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
34 | WERWA Griffith | 1% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
35 | RNO Kyler | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
36 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 1% | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
37 | REZA Farazi | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | NICOLL James | 2% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
38 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 8% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
40 | AKYAMAC Bora | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
41 | NICOLSON William | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
42 | XU Andy P. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
43 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 5% |
44 | WUN Jonathan | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
45 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
46 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
47 | YU Stephen | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
48 | BAI Brian | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
49 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 8% | 46% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
50 | KOVACS Wyatt | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
51 | PEDERSEN Charles | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
52 | LIU Ryan | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
53 | LYNCH Owen C. | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
54 | NICOLL William | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
55 | LEUNG Jin | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
56 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
57 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
58 | DALBERG Anders | 39% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
59 | FRANK Amir | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
60 | TAM Kyle | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | VALENTINE David | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.