ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
2 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
3 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
3 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
5 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 29% |
6 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% |
7 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
8 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
9 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
10 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 7% |
11 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 36% |
12 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
13 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% |
14 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 6% |
15 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 8% |
16 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
17 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% | |
18 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
19 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
20 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
21 | YOON Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% | 4% |
22 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
23 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 9% |
24 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
25 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
26 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% | |
27 | WANG Mason | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
28 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | XU Ethan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
30 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | LI Ayren | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
32 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | - |
33 | TJON Calum | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
34 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
35 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
36 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
37 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - |
38 | NICOLL James | 100% | 98% | 78% | 36% | 6% | - | - |
38 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 100% | 92% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
40 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
41 | NICOLSON William | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
42 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
43 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 5% |
44 | WUN Jonathan | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
45 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
46 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
47 | YU Stephen | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
48 | BAI Brian | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
49 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 100% | 92% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
50 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - |
51 | PEDERSEN Charles | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
52 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
53 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
54 | NICOLL William | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
55 | LEUNG Jin | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
56 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
57 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
58 | DALBERG Anders | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
59 | FRANK Amir | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
60 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | VALENTINE David | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.