Boston , MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | PARK Frederick | V D V V V | V V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | KUMAR Aidan | V V V V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 5 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 6 | LANGTON Sawyer | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 7 | WEI Michael | V V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 8 | RUBIN Jake | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 9 | DESTEFANO Julius | D V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | KATS Dylan G. | V V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 11 | KUBATIN Anton V. | V V D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 12 | ROLLO Emmett H. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 13 | PARK Nicholas | V V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | ZHANG Braydon | V V V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 15 | MUSIENKO Alexander | D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | PRIHODKO Max | D V D D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | IARIKOV Nicholas | V V V V D V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 18 | SKORUPAN Grant | V D V V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 19 | XIE Brandon | V V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | BRODSKY Julian | D V V D V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 21 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | D D D V V V | D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 22 | WALCH Logan | D D V V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 23 | ZHANG William | D V V D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 24 | CHOI Mason | V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 26 | JIANG Matthew | D V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 27 | LI Zachary | D D V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | GONG Haixiang | D D V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 29 | JOSLIN Tyler | D D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 30 | WANG zhixing (Daniel） | D D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 31 | JIANG Bryan | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | WU Jonathan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | PAN Tristan | D D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 34 | GUO ZIXU | V D D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 34 | LIN Zizhen | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 36 | FANG Hanning | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 37 | DOWD Peter L. | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 38 | ZHAI Avalo | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 39 | SANTOS Francisco M. | D D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 40 | SANTOS Antonio K. | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 41 | STEPHENSON Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.