Boston , MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% |
| 2 | PARK Frederick | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 2% | |
| 3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 3 | KUMAR Aidan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 5 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 6 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 50% | 20% |
| 7 | WEI Michael | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | RUBIN Jake | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 9 | DESTEFANO Julius | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 30% | 4% |
| 10 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% | |
| 11 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 13% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 12 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | PARK Nicholas | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | ZHANG Braydon | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 15 | MUSIENKO Alexander | - | 3% | 15% | 39% | 37% | 7% | |
| 16 | PRIHODKO Max | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 17 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 18 | SKORUPAN Grant | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 19 | XIE Brandon | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 20 | BRODSKY Julian | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 21 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% |
| 22 | WALCH Logan | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | ZHANG William | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | CHOI Mason | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | HUANG Adrian | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | JIANG Matthew | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | LI Zachary | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | GONG Haixiang | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | JOSLIN Tyler | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WANG zhixing (Daniel） | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 31 | JIANG Bryan | 7% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | WU Jonathan | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | PAN Tristan | 9% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | GUO ZIXU | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | LIN Zizhen | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | FANG Hanning | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 37 | DOWD Peter L. | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ZHAI Avalo | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 40 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | STEPHENSON Jacob | 10% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.