San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIN Kyran | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | DRIBIN Ezra | D D V D | V V V V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 3 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | WANG DEVON | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | LEE Seungwon | V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | MULCAHY Olaf | V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | CASTELLY Luke | V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 10 | YAO Geoffrey B. | V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 11 | CASASSOVICI Georges | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | REIERSON Risor | V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 13 | BAZHENOV Anthony | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | CHIN Dylan A. | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | KNUDSEN Travis | D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 16 | DAO Alexander | V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 17 | KIM Nathan | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | WANG owen | V V D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 19 | YU Austin | D V V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 20 | CHEN Tyler | D V V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 21 | ZWICKER Jacob | D V V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 22 | LEVENTAL Mark | D V V D D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 23 | TONG Samuel | V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | KIM Jayden | D D V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | CHEN Zhengyang | V D D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 26 | BHATT Arjun | D D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | GAO Zachary | V D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | DOWDELL Riley | V D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | CHEN Bailey | D D D D V | V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 30 | COPEN Elliot P. | D D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 31 | BUERGISSER Kai | V D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 32 | WU Eric | D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 33 | VINODH Matsya | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 34 | ANDERSON Kai | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 35 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 36 | WANG William | D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | CHOI Zachary | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | LI Ethan R. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 39 | BUERGISSER Tae | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 39 | WANG Robert | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 41 | NOFZIGER Bennett | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 42 | ZHAO Colin | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.