The Fencing Center SYC

Y-12 Men's Épée

Friday, October 4, 2019 at 3:00 PM

San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIN Kyran - - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
2 DRIBIN Ezra 1% 9% 30% 40% 20%
3 WIMMER Nathaniel P. - - - 4% 37% 59%
3 WANG DEVON - 1% 5% 23% 43% 28%
5 RICHARDS Jackson D. - 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
6 SCOFIELD Thien J. - 1% 5% 23% 45% 26%
7 LEE Seungwon - - 5% 22% 43% 30%
8 MULCAHY Olaf - - 3% 21% 54% 22%
9 CASTELLY Luke 5% 23% 38% 26% 7%
10 YAO Geoffrey B. - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
11 CASASSOVICI Georges - 3% 18% 37% 33% 9%
12 REIERSON Risor 1% 8% 29% 39% 20% 3%
13 BAZHENOV Anthony - 4% 19% 38% 31% 8%
14 CHIN Dylan A. 2% 12% 33% 36% 15% 2%
15 KNUDSEN Travis 1% 8% 31% 39% 19% 3%
16 DAO Alexander - 8% 28% 38% 22% 4%
17 KIM Nathan - - 4% 21% 45% 29%
18 WANG owen 23% 41% 27% 8% 1%
19 YU Austin 9% 34% 39% 16% 2% -
20 CHEN Tyler 9% 33% 37% 17% 3% -
21 ZWICKER Jacob 5% 26% 39% 24% 6% -
22 LEVENTAL Mark - 3% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2%
23 TONG Samuel 9% 31% 38% 19% 3%
24 KIM Jayden - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 1%
24 CHEN Zhengyang 1% 12% 33% 35% 16% 3% -
26 BHATT Arjun 4% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1%
27 GAO Zachary 15% 40% 33% 11% 1% -
28 DOWDELL Riley 5% 24% 38% 25% 6% 1%
29 CHEN Bailey - 1% 8% 29% 43% 19%
30 COPEN Elliot P. 1% 11% 34% 36% 15% 2%
31 BUERGISSER Kai 35% 41% 19% 4% - - -
32 WU Eric 3% 18% 38% 32% 9%
33 VINODH Matsya 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% -
34 ANDERSON Kai 9% 33% 39% 17% 2% -
35 DAVOODIAN Christopher 4% 23% 41% 27% 4% -
36 WANG William 6% 27% 39% 23% 5% -
37 CHOI Zachary 15% 44% 31% 9% 1% -
38 LI Ethan R. 28% 43% 24% 5% - -
39 BUERGISSER Tae 26% 42% 25% 6% 1% -
39 WANG Robert 53% 38% 8% 1% - -
41 NOFZIGER Bennett 43% 41% 13% 2% - -
42 ZHAO Colin 9% 47% 33% 9% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.