San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Kyran | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 2 | DRIBIN Ezra | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 20% | ||
| 3 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | 4% | 37% | 59% | |
| 3 | WANG DEVON | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 5 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 6 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% | |
| 7 | LEE Seungwon | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 8 | MULCAHY Olaf | - | - | 3% | 21% | 54% | 22% | |
| 9 | CASTELLY Luke | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | ||
| 10 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 11 | CASASSOVICI Georges | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
| 12 | REIERSON Risor | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 13 | BAZHENOV Anthony | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 14 | CHIN Dylan A. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | KNUDSEN Travis | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 16 | DAO Alexander | - | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 17 | KIM Nathan | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% | |
| 18 | WANG owen | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 19 | YU Austin | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | CHEN Tyler | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | ZWICKER Jacob | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | LEVENTAL Mark | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | TONG Samuel | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | ||
| 24 | KIM Jayden | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | CHEN Zhengyang | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 26 | BHATT Arjun | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | GAO Zachary | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | DOWDELL Riley | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 29 | CHEN Bailey | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% | |
| 30 | COPEN Elliot P. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 31 | BUERGISSER Kai | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | WU Eric | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | ||
| 33 | VINODH Matsya | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | ANDERSON Kai | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | WANG William | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | CHOI Zachary | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | LI Ethan R. | 28% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | BUERGISSER Tae | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | WANG Robert | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | ZHAO Colin | 9% | 47% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.