San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 2 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 3 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
| 3 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
| 5 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 6 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | |
| 7 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% | 2% |
| 8 | NG Micah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% |
| 9 | PORPORA Oliver | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 9% | |
| 10 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 23% | |
| 12 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 13 | ZHU Raymond | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 14 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 1% |
| 15 | PARK Sangmin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 4% |
| 16 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | LI Richard | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | DULAI Angad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% |
| 20 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | SHEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 19% | |
| 22 | CARVAJAL Josmar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 9% |
| 23 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 24 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | LI Jonathan | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | YANG Charles | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | ZHANG Graham | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 1% |
| 29 | HE Bourne | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | FU Bryan | 100% | 90% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | TALWALKAR Vedant | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | DANIEL Nikith | 100% | 85% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | DURBIN DJ | 100% | 96% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | RUMPLER Donovan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 37 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ARCARA Evan | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | DE RIDDER Nathan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | SONG Matthew | 100% | 96% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 43 | BAUMAN Colin | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | HE Ian | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LO Liam | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | ANDRADE Cedric | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | SHA Walter | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.