Dominican University New York - Orangeburg, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
2 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
3 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
3 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
5 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
6 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
7 | SUN Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
8 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
9 | KNOX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
10 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | |
11 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
12 | SCAPICCHIO Stephen | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
13 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
14 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 24% |
15 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
16 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
17 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
18 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 9% |
19 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
20 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
21 | WU Marcus | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
22 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
23 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
24 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
25 | SUN James H. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
26 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
27 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
29 | WU Colin | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
30 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 12% |
31 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
32 | GRAYSON Joshua | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
34 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 7% |
35 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
36 | ZHAO kuncheng | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
37 | DUSSEAU Maddax | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
38 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | LEIBOWITZ Ryan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
40 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 5% | |
42 | HOROWITZ Logan | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
44 | NGUYEN Damien | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
45 | DEGENHARDT Zenji | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 8% |
47 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | BAILEY David | 100% | 89% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | |
49 | MEN Junda | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
50 | TANG Charles | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
51 | RIVERA Louis | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
52 | BLANCO Sebastian | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
53 | STELTENKAMP Neal | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
54 | PETROV Niki A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
55 | HOWARD Jackson | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
56 | CHOU Benson | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
58 | SARIDAKIS Ioannis Thanos | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
58 | MA Wilson | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
60 | BENTAHA Averroes | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
61 | JIANG Alex | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.