Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LEE Aidan | V D V V V | V V V V V V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
2 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
3 | KIM Nicholas W. | V D V V D V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 4 | -1.7 |
3 | DAI Jonathan T. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
5 | STANLEY Mason B. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
6 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
7 | BELLUOMO David C. | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
8 | PYO Michael M. | D V D D V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
9 | LIN James G. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
10 | CHEN Earnest P. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
11 | MOHAMED Murad | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
12 | LEE Chris | V V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
13 | BAE Kevin | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
14 | MOHAMED Amir | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
15 | ZOBEL Eric H. | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
16 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | V D V D D V | V V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
17 | KIM Yonjae | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
18 | BING Charles | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
19 | ZHAI Jeffrey | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
20 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | V V D V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
21 | GAO William | V V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
22 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
23 | KENNARD M Henry B. | V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
24 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
25 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
25 | AHN Jun | V D D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
27 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
28 | KEE Andrew L. | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
29 | SAMORA Jose G. | D D V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
30 | LIU Kovi | V D D V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
31 | LEE Jacob | V D D D V | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
32 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | D V D D D | V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
33 | ORLOV Dmitriy | V V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
34 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | D V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
35 | PO Oliver | V V D V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
36 | HE Xiangrui | V V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
37 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
37 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D V V V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
39 | JOSEPH Willem | V V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
40 | GAO Payton | V V D V D V | D | 0.7 | 4 | +3.3 |
41 | WANG mason | V D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
42 | ZHEN Ethan | D V V D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
43 | LANG Dong Lin | D V D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
44 | QIAN Jason H. | V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
45 | HU Robin | D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
45 | PAN Henry | V V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
47 | LI Eric | D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
48 | DOBBINS Evan W. | D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
49 | SONG Bryan | V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
49 | LI Arvin | V V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
51 | MATSAKH Philip | D V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
52 | HAN Changhee | V V V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
53 | TANG Albert | V D V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
54 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | V V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
55 | KNIZHNIK David | V D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
56 | LI Matthew | D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
56 | SHEN jinjie | D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
58 | FINLEY Dylan | D D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
59 | BADLANI Dev | V D D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
60 | XU Ethan | V D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
61 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
62 | LEE Eugene | D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
63 | YULDASHEV Timur | V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
64 | TANG August L. | D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
65 | LU Howen | D V D V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
66 | LIGOS Alex M. | V V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
67 | WANG Winston | V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
68 | STURGIS Zachary C. | V D D V D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
69 | TSAO Lukas | D V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
70 | WANG Rory | D D V V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
71 | HUANG Eythan | V D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
72 | LANGEN Carter M. | D V D D V D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
73 | LEE Jonah | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
74 | SONG Noel | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
75 | AMRANI David | D V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
76 | YAO Bradley | D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
77 | LEVY Jacob | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
78 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
79 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
80 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
81 | POPE Alexander | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
81 | TANG xianchi | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
81 | LUM-DEBONO Alex | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
84 | GUO Justin | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
85 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
86 | GALLER Dave | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
87 | YAP Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
88 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
89 | MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
90 | YANG Dylan | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
91 | GRANADOS Luis | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.