Premier Challenge ROC/VET/RJCC

Div I-A Men's Foil

Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LEE Aidan - - 4% 25% 57% 14%
2 HASSAN Mohamed H. - - - 8% 44% 48%
3 KIM Nicholas W. - - - - 3% 25% 72%
3 DAI Jonathan T. - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
5 STANLEY Mason B. - - - - 5% 31% 64%
6 COSTELLO Chaissen F. - - 4% 22% 46% 28%
7 BELLUOMO David C. 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
8 PYO Michael M. - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
9 LIN James G. - 4% 19% 34% 30% 12% 2%
10 CHEN Earnest P. - - - 2% 27% 71%
11 MOHAMED Murad - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 5%
12 LEE Chris 1% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4%
13 BAE Kevin - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 25%
14 MOHAMED Amir - 1% 6% 24% 39% 25% 4%
15 ZOBEL Eric H. - 1% 6% 25% 44% 25%
16 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
17 KIM Yonjae - - - 5% 22% 43% 29%
18 BING Charles - 1% 7% 27% 44% 22%
19 ZHAI Jeffrey - - 2% 17% 43% 38%
20 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
21 GAO William - 1% 12% 33% 35% 16% 2%
22 SIMA Congyu Josh - 2% 16% 40% 33% 8%
23 KENNARD M Henry B. - - 3% 24% 49% 24%
24 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. - 1% 10% 29% 38% 20% 2%
25 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - - 3% 15% 37% 38% 8%
25 AHN Jun - - 2% 12% 33% 38% 15%
27 HOOSHI Dylan M. - 2% 19% 51% 25% 3%
28 KEE Andrew L. - 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2%
29 SAMORA Jose G. - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 13%
30 LIU Kovi - 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 7%
31 LEE Jacob 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
32 TRAUGOT Owen G. 2% 12% 30% 34% 19% 4%
33 ORLOV Dmitriy 1% 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% < 1%
34 KITAGAWA Eric S. - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10% 1%
35 PO Oliver - 1% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3%
36 HE Xiangrui - 2% 16% 35% 33% 13% 2%
37 ZELTSER Lawrence M. - 5% 24% 42% 24% 4%
37 TAHOUN Mostafa 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
39 JOSEPH Willem - 2% 12% 30% 38% 18%
40 GAO Payton 46% 40% 13% 2% < 1% - -
41 WANG mason 3% 15% 31% 31% 16% 3% -
42 ZHEN Ethan 3% 23% 39% 27% 8% 1% -
43 LANG Dong Lin 2% 12% 30% 35% 19% 4%
44 QIAN Jason H. 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1%
45 HU Robin 1% 12% 33% 36% 15% 2%
45 PAN Henry 3% 20% 42% 28% 7% 1%
47 LI Eric - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
48 DOBBINS Evan W. - - 6% 26% 45% 24%
49 SONG Bryan 3% 17% 37% 32% 11% 1%
49 LI Arvin 2% 18% 42% 32% 6% -
51 MATSAKH Philip 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
52 HAN Changhee - 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 1%
53 TANG Albert 1% 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% -
54 ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman 1% 22% 38% 27% 10% 2% -
55 KNIZHNIK David - 2% 13% 38% 37% 11%
56 LI Matthew 2% 20% 53% 23% 3% -
56 SHEN jinjie 10% 38% 38% 13% 1% -
58 FINLEY Dylan 1% 12% 34% 35% 15% 3% -
59 BADLANI Dev - 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% -
60 XU Ethan 8% 38% 37% 14% 2% - -
61 MUNDAHL Brandon D. 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
62 LEE Eugene 16% 46% 30% 7% 1% -
63 YULDASHEV Timur 7% 33% 40% 17% 3% -
64 TANG August L. 23% 40% 27% 9% 1% -
65 LU Howen 13% 36% 34% 14% 3% - -
66 LIGOS Alex M. 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
67 WANG Winston 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
68 STURGIS Zachary C. 51% 38% 10% 1% - -
69 TSAO Lukas - 3% 17% 35% 32% 12% 1%
70 WANG Rory 30% 44% 21% 5% - - -
71 HUANG Eythan 3% 20% 37% 28% 10% 2% -
72 LANGEN Carter M. - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 5%
73 LEE Jonah 3% 22% 43% 28% 4% -
74 SONG Noel 6% 32% 41% 18% 3% -
75 AMRANI David 68% 29% 3% - - -
76 YAO Bradley 18% 41% 31% 10% 1% -
77 LEVY Jacob 1% 43% 40% 13% 2% - -
78 SYOMICHEV Gleb A. 6% 23% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
79 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 2% 13% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
80 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) 28% 44% 23% 5% - -
81 POPE Alexander 50% 40% 10% 1% - -
81 TANG xianchi 48% 41% 10% 1% - -
81 LUM-DEBONO Alex 14% 56% 26% 3% - -
84 GUO Justin 2% 13% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
85 SRINIVASAN Vedant 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% -
86 GALLER Dave 22% 44% 26% 7% 1% - -
87 YAP Nathan 8% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1% -
88 ZHUANG Chuanxuan 27% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
89 MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent 96% 4% - - - - -
90 YANG Dylan 87% 13% 1% - - - -
91 GRANADOS Luis 63% 31% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.