Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOKENGE Clark | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 2 | WELLS Tommy R. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | ||
| 3 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 3 | IYOKI Kent | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
| 5 | PROCTOR Oliver L. | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 6 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 7 | MIELE Benjamin | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 8 | GRAY Sterling B. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 9 | LEI Joshua | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 10 | MOSES Alexander | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 11 | LLOYD Alex | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 12 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 13 | LIU Alexander | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 14 | POHL Merik A. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 15 | LI Brian X | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | KIM Benjamin I. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 17 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 19 | YOON Nathan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | KUMAR Anitya | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 21 | CAI Kevin P. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 22 | RODNEY Maxwell | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | ||
| 23 | ROY Joseph T. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 24 | KRAVIT Connor B. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 25 | LEI Jacob | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 26 | KOFROTH Zachary R. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 27 | MCDERMOTT Brian | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 28 | GYURE Brayden H. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 29 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BLISS Atticus H. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | LIU John | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | RHYU Kozmo | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | |
| 33 | LUEDECKE Myles A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 34 | BODON Michele I. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 35 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 36 | STEELE DeMario A. | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 37 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | ||
| 38 | DIECK Logan O. | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 39 | BRENNAN Charles F. | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 41 | MORSE Tyler | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 42 | SHIV Rishi | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | BEKKER Mitchel | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 44 | GRAYSON Shane W. | 18% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | SHOURIE Jai | 12% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 46 | STEVENS Daniel | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | SMITH Jackson | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | ||
| 48 | PRASAD Ankith | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | |
| 49 | GARRETT Samuel | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 51 | LEE Timothy S. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 53 | ZHAO Luhan | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | JOSEPH William | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 13% | ||
| 56 | JANG Elliot | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 7% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 57 | HOGAN Gideon | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.