Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KOKENGE Clark | V D V D V V | V V V V V V | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
2 | WELLS Tommy R. | V V V V | V V V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
3 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | D D D V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
3 | IYOKI Kent | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
5 | PROCTOR Oliver L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
6 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
7 | MIELE Benjamin | D V V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
8 | GRAY Sterling B. | D D V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
9 | LEI Joshua | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
10 | MOSES Alexander | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
11 | LLOYD Alex | V D V V D V | V V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
12 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
13 | LIU Alexander | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
14 | POHL Merik A. | D V D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
15 | LI Brian X | D D V D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
16 | KIM Benjamin I. | D D D D D D | V V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
17 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | V V V V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
18 | KIM Juni C. | V V V V V V | D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
19 | YOON Nathan | V D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
20 | KUMAR Anitya | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
21 | CAI Kevin P. | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
22 | RODNEY Maxwell | V D V V | V D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
23 | ROY Joseph T. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | KRAVIT Connor B. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | LEI Jacob | D D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
26 | KOFROTH Zachary R. | D D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
27 | MCDERMOTT Brian | D D V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
28 | GYURE Brayden H. | V D V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
29 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | V V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
30 | BLISS Atticus H. | V D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
31 | LIU John | V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
32 | RHYU Kozmo | D D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
33 | LUEDECKE Myles A. | V V V V V D | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
34 | BODON Michele I. | V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
35 | FARQUHARSON Cole | V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
36 | STEELE DeMario A. | V V D V D D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
37 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
38 | DIECK Logan O. | V D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
39 | BRENNAN Charles F. | V V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
40 | INSLER Ethan C. | V D D D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
41 | MORSE Tyler | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
42 | SHIV Rishi | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
43 | BEKKER Mitchel | V D D V D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
44 | GRAYSON Shane W. | V V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
45 | SHOURIE Jai | D V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
46 | STEVENS Daniel | V V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
47 | SMITH Jackson | D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
48 | PRASAD Ankith | D V D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
49 | GARRETT Samuel | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
50 | LOGUE Ethan D. | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
51 | LEE Timothy S. | D D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
52 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
53 | ZHAO Luhan | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
54 | JOSEPH William | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
55 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
56 | JANG Elliot | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
57 | GOHEL Dayus T. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
57 | HOGAN Gideon | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.