Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | IYOKI Kent | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | KIM Juni C. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LI Brian X | V V D D D V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 5 | POHL Merik A. | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | KRAVIT Connor B. | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 7 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | CAI Kevin P. | D V D D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 9 | LIU Alexander | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 10 | BEKKER Mitchel | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | SMITH Jackson | V V V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 13 | LEE Timothy S. | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | MCDERMOTT Brian | D D D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 15 | SHIV Rishi | D D V D D V | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 16 | DIECK Logan O. | D V D D V D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | LIN Kyran | V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | KOFROTH Zachary R. | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 19 | GYURE Brayden H. | V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | PRASAD Ankith | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 21 | LIU John | V D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 22 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 23 | MOSES Alexander | V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 24 | GRAY Sterling B. | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | SALISBURY Cary | V D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 26 | INSLER Ethan C. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 27 | GARRETT Samuel | D D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 28 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | V D D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 29 | GRAYSON Shane W. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | WELLS Tommy R. | D V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 31 | MORSE Tyler | D D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 33 | BLISS Atticus H. | V V V D D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 34 | LLOYD Alex | V D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 35 | MIELE Benjamin | V D V V D V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 36 | SHOURIE Jai | V V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 37 | WRIGHT Christopher | V V V D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 38 | LEI Jacob | D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 38 | JOSEPH William | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 40 | LIANG Aaron | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 41 | JANG Elliot | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 42 | GATZA Logan | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 43 | KIM Benjamin I. | V V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 44 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | D V D D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 45 | LOGUE Ethan D. | V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 46 | STEVENS Daniel | D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 47 | LEE Alexander G. | V D D D D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 48 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 49 | PARK Elliot | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 50 | CHU Allan | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 51 | STENNIS Brendan | D V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 52 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 53 | ZHAO Luhan | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 54 | HARR Carver | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 55 | GOHEL Dayus T. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 56 | KOH Tommy | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 57 | LOUIE Jason | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 58 | HOGAN Gideon | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.