Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 2 | GUINAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 63% |
| 3 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 62% |
| 3 | MICKO Fritz K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 17% |
| 5 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 6 | TUCKER Brad W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
| 7 | ROSTAL Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 8 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 9 | ROUBAILO Niels | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% |
| 10 | KANAR Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 6% |
| 11 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
| 12 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 13 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | 14% |
| 14 | LING Valdis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 15 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 13% | |
| 16 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 17 | SILVERS Ari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% |
| 18 | ZHENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
| 19 | WANG William M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% |
| 20 | CORRALES Victor M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 21 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | |
| 23 | MCKEEVER Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% | |
| 24 | NOWAK Jakub P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% |
| 25 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | STEELE DeMario A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 21% |
| 27 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 29 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 100% | 97% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | LI Jesse | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 31 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 7% | - |
| 32 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | < 1% | |
| 34 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | 100% | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 35 | NDJEKA Jesse | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% |
| 36 | ROBINSON Matthew | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 38 | CURTY Jack | 100% | 90% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | BAILEY William F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 40 | VEZMAR Evan H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | |
| 41 | HEIM Bryce | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 42 | STENCEL Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 43 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 44 | MURPHY Aidan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 45 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 46 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | SHEPHERD Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 48 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | GREGORY Abram | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 50 | LIMER Avi | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | ECKEL Anson J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 52 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SARKAR agniv | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 54 | ZEKO David J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% | 16% |
| 55 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 14% |
| 55 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 57 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 58 | WILKINSON Derek H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
| 59 | LUEDECKE Myles A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 60 | MAYER Vinzenz | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
| 61 | HERSCOVICI Aaron | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | RAY William | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | BRADFORD Ethan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 65 | ZHANG Michael | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | VARNEY Douglas W. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 67 | MOHAMED Sabir | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 68 | MCDOWELL Will | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | COLEMAN Ian | 100% | 89% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | LI Chenyu | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 71 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 72 | WILLIAMS Logan | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 73 | SOKOLIK Lucas W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 74 | ZHANG James | 100% | 91% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | YANG Zeke | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 76 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
| 77 | DHAL Leon | 100% | 96% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | MALEADY Sean | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 79 | GRAVES Lawson | 100% | 98% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 80 | LASKA Patryk | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 81 | BEACH John | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 82 | UNG Kai | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | BARFORD Giovanni | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | FRANGER Max | 100% | 79% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 85 | VAGGALIS Denny | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 86 | CHEN Bowen | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 87 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 88 | CHU Duong | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 89 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 89 | GROOTHUIS David | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 91 | ST. GEORGE David J. | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 92 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.