Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TRAN Dai Long | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
2 | RHYU Kozmo | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
3 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
3 | KIM Donghyeok | - | 3% | 12% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 6% |
5 | HANXU Richard A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
6 | LIU John | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
7 | PARK Ian C. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
8 | LEE Timothy S. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
9 | KROPP Jack | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
10 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
11 | LU Sebastian X. | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
12 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
13 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
14 | PARK Prestan S. | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
15 | ADLER Ethan M. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
16 | HERMANSON David B. | 6% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
17 | LEE Shwan | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
18 | PLUMER Jack E. | - | 3% | 13% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
19 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
20 | STEVENS Daniel | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
21 | CLICK Aiden | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
22 | WU Byron | - | 5% | 30% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
23 | PARK Vincent | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
24 | WANG Tristan | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
25 | LI Jeffrey | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
26 | TRIMMER Colin | 4% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 4% | - |
27 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
28 | KING Cameron | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
29 | ZHANG Andrew | 2% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
30 | PICCUS Isaac S. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
31 | CHONG christopher | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
32 | HORTELANO Ethan | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
33 | KUTTRUS Max D. | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
34 | BAGHA Armin | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
35 | NOMANI Shibli D. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% | |
36 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
37 | MUN Chur-Yong | 13% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 6% | 35% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
39 | YI Jason | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
40 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | 27% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | MILLER Kurt | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
42 | FU Ethan | 14% | 43% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
43 | LEE JUNYOUNG | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
44 | KANACH Duncan | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
45 | CHOI Marcus | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
46 | LAM Bill | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
47 | HOPKINS Samuel | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
48 | REITINGER Luke M. | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
48 | KIM Ryan | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
50 | ZHANG Andy | 52% | 42% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.