Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TRAN Dai Long | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 2 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
| 3 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | |
| 3 | KIM Donghyeok | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 59% | 27% | 6% |
| 5 | HANXU Richard A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
| 6 | LIU John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 7 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 8 | LEE Timothy S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 9 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 10 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 11 | LU Sebastian X. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 12 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 13 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 13% | |
| 14 | PARK Prestan S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 8% | |
| 15 | ADLER Ethan M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 16 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | |
| 18 | PLUMER Jack E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 19 | WIMMER Chandler M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
| 20 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 21 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 22 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | |
| 23 | PARK Vincent | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 24 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 26 | TRIMMER Colin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 46% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 28 | KING Cameron | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 29 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | PICCUS Isaac S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 31 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | HORTELANO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 50% | 20% | 3% |
| 33 | KUTTRUS Max D. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 34 | BAGHA Armin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | NOMANI Shibli D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 36 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 37 | MUN Chur-Yong | 100% | 87% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 94% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | YI Jason | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | 100% | 73% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | MILLER Kurt | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | FU Ethan | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | LEE JUNYOUNG | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | KANACH Duncan | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 45 | CHOI Marcus | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | LAM Bill | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | HOPKINS Samuel | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | REITINGER Luke M. | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 48% | 6% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.