National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Y-14 Men's Foil

Friday, July 5, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIN Youlong - - - - 1% 12% 88%
2 CHOI Ethan - - - - 7% 41% 52%
3 WU Alber Y. - - - - 1% 14% 85%
3 ZHANG Aaron - - - 1% 9% 36% 55%
5 LEE Brendan - - - - 1% 15% 84%
5 RAUTUREAU Hugo - - - 4% 18% 43% 35%
7 TAN Aidan - - - - 5% 31% 64%
7 YAO Bradley - - - 1% 8% 36% 56%
9 LING Eddie - - - - 1% 18% 81%
10 QIAN Jason H. - - - - 1% 16% 83%
11 GUTH Joseph - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
12 LIU Derek - - - 1% 10% 37% 52%
12 ZENG Rick - - 1% 11% 37% 41% 11%
14 LI Aaron - - - 1% 7% 40% 53%
15 CHEN Matthew - - - 3% 21% 50% 26%
16 DONG Richard - - - 1% 13% 45% 41%
17 XU Andy P. - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
18 MAO Lucas - - - 3% 19% 45% 33%
19 LO Preston - - - 1% 8% 37% 54%
19 ROZALSKI Eli - - 1% 7% 27% 45% 20%
21 CHEN Hanson - - - 2% 14% 42% 43%
21 ZHANG Jacob - - - 1% 8% 37% 54%
23 LIU Ethan - - - - 2% 20% 78%
23 KIM Daniel Y. - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
25 NGUYEN Martin - - - - 3% 23% 74%
26 DERRICK Blake - - - - 5% 30% 65%
26 LU Kevin - - - 1% 7% 33% 59%
28 CHENG Ethan - - - 4% 31% 64%
29 LU Royce - - - 1% 10% 45% 44%
30 FUKUDA Diego - - - 2% 14% 42% 43%
31 SHENG Dalton - - - 2% 12% 40% 47%
32 PARK Rion - - - 1% 10% 39% 51%
33 SENIC Lucas - - - - 2% 19% 79%
34 RASMUSSEN Sage - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
34 YI William - - - 2% 14% 44% 40%
36 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas - - 1% 6% 25% 44% 24%
37 LI Bradley - - - 1% 8% 37% 54%
38 PARKER Isaiah - 2% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
39 MARTIN Darius - - - 5% 26% 46% 22%
40 LI Richard - - 2% 19% 54% 24%
41 MAZAHERI Fletcher - - - 4% 18% 42% 35%
42 PARK Steve (Sangmin) - - 1% 6% 27% 44% 22%
43 TANG Alexander L. - - - 5% 25% 47% 23%
44 CORTRIGHT Skipper - - - - 5% 32% 62%
45 NEICE William - 1% 11% 33% 38% 16% 1%
46 CHOI Benjamin - - 3% 15% 36% 35% 10%
46 DOELL Ethan - - 1% 7% 23% 41% 29%
48 PARRISH Evan - - - 2% 17% 51% 30%
49 ZHAO Adam - - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
50 GHEDINI Luca - - - 3% 17% 44% 36%
51 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn - - 2% 15% 40% 38% 4%
52 GORDON William L. - - 4% 18% 39% 31% 7%
52 MORROW Brenden - - - 2% 16% 45% 36%
54 SIMONOV Timofey - - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
54 PALMA Nathan Anthony - - - 4% 24% 51% 21%
56 HOWLAND Jonas - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 22%
57 SUAREZ Adrian - - - 2% 16% 43% 39%
58 LU Alex - - 4% 17% 37% 36% 7%
59 BORG Matthew - - 5% 19% 38% 32% 6%
60 LEE Charles T - 1% 7% 22% 37% 28% 5%
61 ALLEN Henry G. - - - 7% 40% 53%
62 VADEN Oliver - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 28%
63 RAJ Jay - - - 5% 26% 47% 21%
64 CHEN Kyle P. - - - 2% 12% 40% 47%
65 CHUANG Oscar - - 1% 8% 31% 42% 19%
66 GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 31%
67 ELKOUSY Zain al Din - - 2% 11% 33% 43% 12%
68 ZHAO Brian - 2% 11% 31% 37% 16% 2%
69 TWEMLOW Sacha - - 2% 12% 38% 40% 8%
70 RAUTUREAU Arthur - - 4% 19% 41% 31% 5%
71 SISINNI Leonardo - - 2% 15% 39% 35% 8%
72 FANG Haoyu - 1% 6% 22% 38% 28% 5%
73 CHEN Ethan - - - 5% 22% 45% 29%
74 WONG Evan - - 1% 8% 29% 43% 19%
75 PETROV Mikhail 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% -
76 XIE Jicheng - 1% 10% 31% 39% 17% 1%
77 WANDJI Noah - - - 6% 26% 44% 23%
77 PARK William - 2% 13% 34% 37% 13% 1%
79 SENANI Arjun - 1% 5% 22% 42% 25% 4%
80 LOZANO Veyron Jericho - - 3% 16% 36% 35% 9%
80 ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan - 2% 12% 30% 36% 18% 3%
82 DESERANNO Leander - - 3% 16% 38% 34% 9%
83 CHOI Ethan - 1% 6% 24% 41% 25% 3%
84 HARROCH Faustin - - 5% 27% 42% 23% 3%
85 NICOLETTI Luca - - - - 1% 18% 80%
86 BIELER Mason - - 3% 16% 37% 36% 8%
87 LU Nathan - - 2% 11% 34% 39% 14%
88 POLEBOYINA Amrit 2% 14% 34% 33% 14% 3% -
89 FEDELI Francesco - - 2% 15% 38% 36% 9%
90 LE Jacob H. - - 1% 6% 24% 44% 26%
91 ZHONG Maxwell - - 3% 16% 39% 34% 7%
92 WANG Rory - - - 3% 19% 53% 25%
92 LI Lucas - 1% 7% 25% 41% 25% 2%
94 CHANG Eric Jonathan - 1% 6% 23% 43% 25% 3%
95 ZHOU Ryan - 1% 5% 22% 40% 27% 4%
95 BOESKIN Nolan - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 3%
97 LEE Christopher T. - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
97 LIU Yinhong - 1% 7% 25% 39% 25% 3%
99 ZHANG Hanru - - 4% 21% 42% 29% 5%
100 SHANNON Jack - 4% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2%
101 JIMENEZ Naveen - - 5% 23% 41% 26% 5%
102 ZHENG Marcus - 1% 6% 21% 37% 29% 6%
103 KIM Gene - 6% 27% 40% 22% 4% -
104 COSSROW Alex 2% 17% 35% 31% 13% 2% -
105 MO Ethan - 1% 13% 38% 36% 11% 1%
106 TANG Royce 3% 16% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
106 CHAN Joseph 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
108 YU William - - 4% 25% 41% 25% 5%
108 TOOMRE Kai - 1% 11% 37% 37% 13% 1%
110 HE Kyle - - 3% 15% 35% 36% 11%
111 PARK David 1% 6% 23% 39% 25% 6% 1%
112 YANG Charles - - 4% 19% 38% 31% 7%
112 WANG sicheng 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% 1% -
114 ZHAO Nathan - 1% 5% 21% 40% 28% 6%
115 YUE Jackson - 4% 18% 35% 31% 11% 1%
116 SICAT Justin - 5% 20% 36% 29% 9% 1%
117 CHO Xzander - 1% 10% 33% 45% 11%
118 KUE Temujin 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
119 TAN Xinlai - 1% 7% 27% 40% 22% 3%
120 LEE Jayden J. - 1% 6% 21% 39% 30% 3%
121 LING Carson Jr - - 5% 26% 41% 23% 5%
121 HUA Aaron - 2% 11% 29% 38% 19% 1%
123 HOU Gaven - 5% 22% 38% 27% 7% 1%
124 FUKUDA Brando - 2% 12% 31% 36% 16% 2%
125 RODRIGUEZ Tyler - 1% 5% 19% 36% 30% 8%
126 LI Allen - - 2% 14% 39% 34% 9%
127 WONG Jacob W. 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3% -
128 MARISI Gabriel - - 3% 19% 41% 32% 6%
129 CHENG Logan - - 2% 12% 33% 41% 12%
130 YOON Junhyeok - - - 2% 18% 45% 34%
131 CZARNECKI Thomas 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3% -
132 PE Noah - 2% 15% 37% 36% 10% 1%
133 HE Bourne 2% 14% 35% 35% 12% 2% -
134 KO Caleb - - 3% 20% 48% 25% 4%
135 HICKEY Connor - - 3% 16% 39% 37% 4%
136 SLUSHER Gideon - - 4% 20% 40% 30% 5%
137 METZ Mason - 1% 6% 24% 41% 26% 2%
138 CHANG Jonathan - - 4% 16% 35% 34% 11%
139 PAN Ethan - 3% 14% 32% 35% 14% 2%
140 TEH Tang-Ngu 1% 7% 26% 37% 22% 5% -
141 LIM EUNSEONG - 1% 8% 33% 40% 17% 2%
142 TSOI Spencer - 5% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
143 TOYOFUKU Ethan 2% 11% 29% 34% 19% 4% -
144 NABASSOUA Djibril 4% 19% 35% 30% 11% 2% -
145 ANDRADE Cedric 13% 37% 34% 13% 2% - -
146 MCKEE Calvin 1% 8% 25% 35% 24% 7% 1%
147 HART-SYED declan 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% - -
148 CHUN Dashel - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
149 O'LEARY Colin - 5% 21% 39% 27% 7% 1%
150 HOLMES Alexiy - 1% 11% 35% 38% 13% 1%
151 FOY Grant 3% 15% 31% 31% 16% 4% -
152 SHAW Spencer 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2% -
153 VARRE Rishi - 7% 26% 38% 24% 6% -
154 MURPHY Jonathan 4% 21% 39% 29% 7% -
155 BAI Austin - 6% 28% 49% 16% 1%
156 WEI Winston 3% 19% 36% 29% 10% 2% -
157 KOE Declan - 5% 27% 42% 21% 4% -
158 PLUMMER Waylon 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 2% -
159 FRASER Rhys - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% -
159 PARK Andrew - 1% 10% 29% 39% 20% 1%
161 GE Felix Fei - 2% 12% 33% 37% 15% 1%
162 ONG Nicholas - - 4% 28% 44% 21% 3%
163 SIMMES Jackson - - 7% 35% 41% 16% 2%
164 POPOKH Luca 11% 33% 36% 17% 4% - -
165 SUN Henry - 3% 14% 33% 35% 15% 1%
166 LEBEDOVYCH Tristin - 4% 18% 34% 30% 11% 1%
166 LI Daniel 1% 11% 29% 36% 19% 4% -
168 HAN Alexander - 1% 10% 34% 39% 15% 2%
169 UPENDER West - 4% 28% 41% 21% 4% -
169 QIAN Henry 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 4% -
169 YEE Colin 1% 7% 25% 38% 23% 5% -
172 MASSIMINO Andrew - 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 4%
172 ZHAO Ryan 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6% -
174 GOFF Nathaniel - 2% 13% 31% 36% 17% 1%
175 GUO Austin 6% 27% 40% 22% 5% - -
176 ZHANG Jayden - 6% 30% 45% 17% 2% -
176 ZHANG Andrew 8% 30% 38% 20% 4% - -
176 LEHTINEN Axel 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1% -
176 MOLDOVEANU Roman 10% 32% 37% 18% 3% - -
180 HUYNH Matthew - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
181 MANDZY Theodor - - 1% 8% 30% 44% 17%
181 SHIN Noah 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
183 ZHANG Jason 6% 24% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
184 GRIGORIEV Michael - 4% 17% 34% 32% 12% 1%
184 JACOB Ezra 20% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
186 WAYBRIGHT Matteo 9% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
187 YU ShiYu (Henry) - 3% 25% 42% 24% 5% -
187 LIANG Haojia 22% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
189 ONIK Ari N. 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
189 CHOI Hunter 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% - -
191 CHEN Anson - 3% 16% 34% 33% 12% 1%
191 WANG Elijah (QiChen) - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% 1%
193 MCMILLIAN Harrison 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% 1% -
193 HONG Derek 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1% -
195 BOWLES Kevin 3% 25% 48% 20% 3% - -
195 JIN Andy - 5% 20% 36% 29% 9% 1%
197 HARRIS Julien 5% 25% 40% 24% 6% 1% -
198 DAO-CRESPO Joaquin 8% 28% 37% 22% 5% - -
199 NUCKLES Caden 8% 32% 37% 18% 4% - -
200 CHA James 1% 6% 26% 39% 23% 5% -
201 HE Ryan 2% 15% 35% 34% 13% 2% -
202 ABRAMKIN Tim - 5% 21% 38% 28% 8% -
203 PETINO Leonardo 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
203 YU ShiLin (Harry) 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
203 SUNDSTROM Wren 18% 43% 30% 8% 1% - -
206 HUANG Nathan 14% 35% 33% 15% 3% - -
207 EDWARDS Connor 1% 14% 54% 26% 4% - -
208 HONG Edwin 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% 1% -
209 DAVIS Benjamin 5% 31% 39% 20% 5% - -
210 DULAI Angad 12% 37% 36% 14% 2% - -
211 YE Jerry 2% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
212 LIM-SEIWERT Tristan 27% 46% 23% 4% - -
213 GREENE Max 14% 38% 34% 12% 2% -
214 SHARDONOFSKY Keelan 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6% -
215 WONG Braxton 2% 14% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
216 QIAN Zekai - 6% 23% 38% 26% 7% -
217 ZHANG GAVIN J - 3% 15% 33% 34% 13% 1%
218 MARTIRE Luca 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
219 DELA CRUZ Lorenzo 18% 41% 31% 9% 1% - -
220 CHANG Parker 1% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
221 BEYDOUN Sam 9% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
221 WILLIAMS Matthew 12% 32% 34% 17% 4% - -
223 WU Thomas 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
224 HE Ian 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
224 HARWOOD Gray 7% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
226 YANG Tate - 2% 13% 33% 38% 14% 1%
227 GRACEY Gavin 2% 14% 37% 35% 12% 1% -
228 LEE Thomas 2% 12% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
229 UYPECKCUAT Maximillian Trajan 1% 6% 25% 39% 24% 5% -
229 LATORRE Leonardo 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5% -
231 ZHAN Kevin - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
232 HASTINGS Alex 46% 39% 13% 2% - - -
232 TOEWS Jackson 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
234 DULAI Agam 3% 43% 41% 12% 1% - -
235 OH Christopher 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% -
236 TARCHICHI Robby 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
237 JAZWINSKI Ryan 1% 8% 30% 39% 19% 3% -
237 TURNER Finian 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
239 WANG Luke 2% 14% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
240 XU Nathan 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2% -
240 BHANOT Arjun 33% 42% 20% 5% - - -
242 SOHN Aiden 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
242 CHUN Zachary 18% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
242 DIAZ Gabriel 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1% -
242 KIM Daniel 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
246 DEPP Edward 9% 34% 37% 16% 3% - -
247 BLACK John 41% 50% 9% - - - -
248 ZHANG Hanson 22% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
249 KOE Beckett 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
250 WANG Mendy 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
250 PHILLIPS Oliver 14% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
252 BESSELMAN Noah 2% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3% -
253 PARK Jayden 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
254 WEI JR Shan 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 3% -
255 LIU Tony 5% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1% -
256 LEE Christopher 26% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
257 SLAIN Owen 4% 22% 39% 27% 8% 1% -
258 CHANG Jeremy 1% 5% 19% 35% 29% 10% 1%
258 ZENG Albert 17% 39% 32% 10% 1% - -
258 LAM Kirin 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
258 CHAN William 46% 44% 10% 1% - - -
262 COOK Grant 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
263 MANIKTALA Suvir 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 3% -
263 KIM Andrew 9% 30% 37% 20% 4% - -
263 HO Christopher 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
266 LI Jayden 12% 38% 34% 13% 2% - -
266 PARK Jubin 15% 44% 34% 7% 1% - -
268 GUO Joey 6% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1% -
268 HALIM Seif 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 2% -
270 HU Daniel 2% 42% 43% 13% 1% - -
271 TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin 2% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
272 OH Joshua 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% -
273 XIA Philip 24% 46% 25% 4% - -
274 WANG Ancen 7% 28% 39% 22% 4% -
275 CHOI Elliot 8% 47% 36% 9% 1% - -
276 LUK Trusten 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% 1% -
277 REN Ryan 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
278 DEROSA Patrick 10% 38% 40% 11% 1% - -
279 YAVENDITTI William 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
280 YANG Arthur 6% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1% -
281 BLACK Henry 18% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
281 LIU Alex 4% 19% 34% 29% 11% 2% -
283 ZHOU Justin 2% 15% 37% 33% 12% 2% -
284 LIANG Ethan 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
285 SU Desmond 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
286 DHOKTE Neev 1% 9% 28% 38% 20% 4% -
286 GUDIMETLA Siddhanth 20% 42% 29% 8% 1% - -
288 KINGSLEY Griffin 2% 14% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
288 SUAREZ David - 1% 7% 27% 41% 21% 3%
288 NAIDL Micah 1% 23% 48% 24% 4% - -
288 YOUNG Jack 15% 50% 30% 5% - - -
292 REYES Yannik 21% 41% 28% 8% 1% - -
293 NOVIKOV Yann 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
293 SHAW eric 1% 21% 48% 26% 4% - -
295 FALCONE Jack 4% 22% 38% 28% 7% 1% -
296 HUANG Jinyao 3% 19% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
297 KOVACS Harrison 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
298 TURNER Jackson 18% 37% 30% 12% 2% - -
299 NOLAN Tyler 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
299 WENGER Rowan 8% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
301 WEI Augustus 6% 27% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
301 SYMMANK Callen 2% 20% 46% 26% 6% - -
303 CHENG Mason 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
304 WENGER Liam 5% 23% 37% 27% 8% 1% -
304 GRUNENWALD Henri 17% 38% 31% 11% 2% - -
306 DIMINO Kartik 15% 47% 30% 7% 1% - -
307 KAYE Ben 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
308 CALESHU Bauer 37% 52% 11% 1% - - -
309 BERETICH Brian 5% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
309 SU Preston 18% 38% 31% 12% 2% - -
311 WANG ZEYU 12% 36% 36% 14% 2% - -
312 LIU Robert 7% 29% 40% 21% 4% - -
313 ZHENG Austin 10% 33% 37% 17% 3% - -
313 WEYANDT Tyler 42% 42% 14% 2% - - -
315 GOGOI Kavi 26% 44% 24% 5% - - -
315 ALI Adam 28% 53% 17% 2% - - -
317 GELLAD Luke 2% 12% 31% 36% 18% 2% -
318 TAGORE Reyansh 38% 42% 16% 3% - - -
319 CHUN Alexander 73% 24% 2% - - - -
319 KARLEKAR Ved 25% 44% 24% 6% 1% - -
321 JIN Xuechong Daniel 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
322 CHIANG Aiden 22% 44% 27% 7% 1% - -
323 SUN Neo 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
323 LEE Abin 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
325 WARD Spencer 27% 43% 24% 5% - - -
325 PARMAR Veer 43% 43% 12% 1% - - -
325 HAN Nathan 17% 39% 31% 10% 1% - -
328 YUN Max 4% 22% 39% 27% 7% 1% -
329 CHEN Jason 14% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
330 KUANG Cyrus 13% 34% 33% 16% 4% - -
330 GANAPATHI Eshan 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
330 SIMANDJUNTAK Joshua 2% 40% 40% 15% 2% - -
330 TOSCANO Sebastian 25% 45% 24% 5% 1% - -
334 GADOW Patrick 9% 36% 41% 13% 1% -
335 REYNOLDS CHANG Luke 89% 10% - - - - -
335 BABER Shaheer 44% 40% 14% 2% - - -
335 LINEBERRY CADEN 12% 37% 35% 14% 2% - -
335 ZHANG Julian 15% 39% 32% 12% 2% - -
339 PAINTER Zachary 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
339 XU Rambert 25% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
339 ZHANG Ethan 41% 42% 15% 2% - - -
339 DALAL Amitav 46% 47% 7% - - - -
343 BALES Gabriel 24% 41% 26% 7% 1% - -
344 FRASER Alistair 65% 30% 5% - - - -
344 JIANG Bohan 1% 8% 36% 39% 14% 2% -
344 KARPMAN Benny 18% 40% 30% 10% 2% - -
344 MAZAHERI John 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
348 PARK Maxwell 13% 34% 34% 16% 3% - -
348 GODIN Willis 37% 43% 17% 3% - - -
348 MCCONKEY Tristan 14% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
348 ZMUDA Aiden 8% 29% 38% 21% 4% - -
348 NELKA Brenden 58% 36% 6% - - - -
348 KOPELMAN Henry 44% 50% 6% - - - -
354 HILL Kai 34% 44% 19% 3% - - -
354 HSU Liam 91% 9% - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.