AFM Super Regional SYC/RJCC/ROC Div1A/Vet

Y-10 Men's Foil

Saturday, October 26, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 WU Wallace - - - - - 5% 95%
2 SUN Roy - - - 2% 12% 41% 45%
3 YU Jinyuan - 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 5%
3 TAO Jiemi - - - - - 8% 92%
5 WU Gengze (Daniel) - - - 1% 8% 34% 57%
6 YANG Steve - - - 2% 13% 40% 44%
7 MAZAHERI John - - 1% 5% 19% 40% 34%
8 PARK Avan - - 1% 7% 25% 40% 26%
9 EVANS Desmond - - - 3% 19% 46% 31%
10 FOO Kingston - - 3% 16% 38% 34% 8%
11 TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen - - - 3% 18% 43% 35%
12 JIN Xueyuan George - - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
13 LAM Lazarus - 3% 15% 32% 33% 14% 2%
14 PESKIN Kepler - - - 1% 11% 38% 49%
15 CHEN Kyle - - - 5% 24% 46% 25%
16 TURBAT Travis - 5% 19% 35% 31% 10%
17 CHEN Dante - 4% 23% 46% 25% 1%
18 LU Brandon - - 3% 18% 40% 34% 5%
19 LI Yunze - 1% 5% 23% 39% 27% 5%
20 GU Evan 10% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
21 LOZANO Koen Alexander - 5% 18% 32% 30% 13% 2%
22 CREMEL Remi - 4% 18% 35% 32% 11%
23 TAN Benjamin - - 4% 19% 44% 33%
24 WANG Eason - - 3% 16% 39% 33% 8%
25 KAJITA Grayson - - 4% 17% 41% 37% 1%
25 ZHANG William - - 3% 15% 35% 36% 11%
27 CHONG Tanner - 6% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
28 WANG Mingcheng - 1% 7% 22% 36% 27% 7%
29 SHENOY Neil - 5% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
30 WU Vincent Moxiao - - 2% 11% 34% 40% 14%
31 ZHANG Aiden 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 8%
32 ZHANG alex 4% 19% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
33 LI Lief - 4% 16% 32% 31% 15% 2%
34 YU Ethan - 1% 7% 24% 41% 26% 1%
35 YIN Luke 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
36 ELSAYED Omar - 4% 16% 34% 34% 12% -
37 SINGH Reyaansh - 2% 12% 28% 35% 20% 3%
38 YAN Aaron 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
39 LIN Dylan 2% 13% 29% 33% 18% 4% -
40 WANG Ian 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
41 RAJ Yojith - 4% 21% 38% 27% 7% 1%
42 FUNG Caleb 4% 30% 41% 20% 4% -
43 TROYANKER Makar - 1% 8% 27% 40% 22% 3%
44 LEUNG Joon - 1% 6% 23% 39% 26% 5%
45 LIGERET Leo - - 2% 13% 37% 37% 11%
46 LIU Bradley - 3% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
47 LIN Sampson - 1% 7% 26% 39% 22% 4%
48 LIN Zhengxuan 9% 31% 36% 19% 5% - -
49 TIKHONOV Aleksandr 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 6% -
50 ZENG Cayden 4% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1% -
51 XIE Garrett 6% 31% 40% 19% 4% - -
52 SUN Lucas 18% 38% 31% 12% 2% -
53 NGUYEN Norris 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1%
54 BAGWELL Theodore 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1% -
55 LIN Stewart 12% 40% 35% 12% 2% - -
56 ZHANG Charlie - 5% 23% 39% 25% 7% 1%
57 MENG Eric 1% 6% 20% 32% 27% 11% 2%
58 MENG Andy 2% 17% 38% 31% 10% 1% -
59 WANG Andy 15% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
60 AGUILAR Asher 2% 14% 29% 32% 18% 5% -
61 LIN Evan 1% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4% -
62 SPICER-YOUAKIM Benjamin 15% 39% 33% 11% 2% - -
63 XU Daniel 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1%
64 DONG YIKUN 14% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
65 STOCK Ian 4% 25% 42% 24% 6% 1% -
66 NGO Lincoln 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
67 VIEN Bradley 6% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
68 LEE Roland 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% - -
69 ROSOWSKY Phoenix 10% 35% 35% 15% 3% - -
70 LI Mason 2% 10% 26% 33% 21% 7% 1%
71 XU Benjamin 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
72 HUANG Owen - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11% 1%
72 PAYNE Luca 4% 19% 36% 29% 11% 1% -
74 BROD Baylin 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
75 WONG Sebastian 4% 19% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
76 CHEN Rylan 2% 21% 40% 29% 8% 1%
77 PHILLIPS Julian - 3% 16% 40% 35% 6%
78 ZHANG Bryant 52% 38% 9% 1% - -
79 JI Dylan 11% 38% 35% 13% 2% - -
80 BEZBORODKO-VILLAIN Jules 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
81 YANG Nolan 35% 42% 18% 4% - - -
82 CHEN Alwyn 12% 32% 33% 17% 4% 1% -
83 THIMIRI Trishaan 7% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1% -
84 GADDY Lachlan 2% 16% 37% 32% 11% 2% -
85 LI Ethan 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
86 XIAO Albert 45% 41% 12% 2% - - -
87 LEE Reiden 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
88 CREMEL Louis 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
89 YANG Jaron 4% 19% 32% 28% 13% 3% -
90 FUNG Lucas 46% 40% 12% 1% - - -
90 MOK Jason 56% 36% 8% 1% - - -
92 JACOBE Jakyn 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
92 SONG Matthew 13% 34% 33% 16% 3% - -
94 ZHANG Xitai (Louis) 14% 36% 34% 14% 2% - -
95 CHEN Wyatt 20% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
96 MALAKAN Noah < 1% 4% 21% 44% 25% 6% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.