Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% |
2 | SUN Roy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
3 | YU Jinyuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
3 | TAO Jiemi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% |
5 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
6 | YANG Steve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
7 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 34% |
8 | PARK Avan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 26% |
9 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
10 | FOO Kingston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 8% |
11 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
12 | JIN Xueyuan George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
13 | LAM Lazarus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
14 | PESKIN Kepler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 49% |
15 | CHEN Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 25% |
16 | TURBAT Travis | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
17 | CHEN Dante | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% | 1% | |
18 | LU Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 5% |
19 | LI Yunze | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
20 | GU Evan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
21 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
22 | CREMEL Remi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
23 | TAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
24 | WANG Eason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% |
25 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | 1% |
25 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
27 | CHONG Tanner | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
28 | WANG Mingcheng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
29 | SHENOY Neil | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
30 | WU Vincent Moxiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% |
31 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
32 | ZHANG alex | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | LI Lief | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
34 | YU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% | 1% |
35 | YIN Luke | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
36 | ELSAYED Omar | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | - |
37 | SINGH Reyaansh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
38 | YAN Aaron | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
39 | LIN Dylan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
40 | WANG Ian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
41 | RAJ Yojith | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
42 | FUNG Caleb | 100% | 96% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | |
43 | TROYANKER Makar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
44 | LEUNG Joon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
45 | LIGERET Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% |
46 | LIU Bradley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
47 | LIN Sampson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
48 | LIN Zhengxuan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
49 | TIKHONOV Aleksandr | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
50 | ZENG Cayden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
51 | XIE Garrett | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
52 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
53 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
54 | BAGWELL Theodore | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
55 | LIN Stewart | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
56 | ZHANG Charlie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
57 | MENG Eric | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
58 | MENG Andy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
59 | WANG Andy | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
60 | AGUILAR Asher | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
61 | LIN Evan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 4% | - |
62 | SPICER-YOUAKIM Benjamin | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
63 | XU Daniel | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
64 | DONG YIKUN | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
65 | STOCK Ian | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
66 | NGO Lincoln | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | VIEN Bradley | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
68 | LEE Roland | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
69 | ROSOWSKY Phoenix | 100% | 90% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
70 | LI Mason | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
71 | XU Benjamin | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
72 | HUANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
72 | PAYNE Luca | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
74 | BROD Baylin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - |
75 | WONG Sebastian | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
76 | CHEN Rylan | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
77 | PHILLIPS Julian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 6% | |
78 | ZHANG Bryant | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
79 | JI Dylan | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
80 | BEZBORODKO-VILLAIN Jules | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
81 | YANG Nolan | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
82 | CHEN Alwyn | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
83 | THIMIRI Trishaan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
84 | GADDY Lachlan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
85 | LI Ethan | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
86 | XIAO Albert | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
87 | LEE Reiden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
88 | CREMEL Louis | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
89 | YANG Jaron | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
90 | FUNG Lucas | 100% | 54% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
90 | MOK Jason | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
92 | JACOBE Jakyn | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
92 | SONG Matthew | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
94 | ZHANG Xitai (Louis) | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
95 | CHEN Wyatt | 100% | 80% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
96 | MALAKAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.