Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Ryan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 2 | ZHU Max | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 3 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% |
| 3 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 5 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 6 | CHUNG Thomas | - | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 7 | GREEN Ummi | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 8 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 9 | GREEN Jabreel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 10 | CHU Anthony | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 11 | MOHEBI Saam | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 12 | USHER Alexander | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 13 | UZGIRIS Kovas | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 14 | AHN Gus | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 16 | KIM Darius H. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | BAZHENOV Anthony | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
| 18 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | THOMPSON Chester | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | WONG Nathan | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 1% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 24 | JIN daniel | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | LIN Kyran | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | YEH Preston | 13% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | FEES HOLDEN | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 29 | KOPPE Alexander | 1% | 9% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 30 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | WANG DEVON | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | < 1% | 6% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | CHU Allan | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | COPEN Samuel S. | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ONTIVEROS Miller | 15% | 45% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | JAIN Aditya | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | MUIR Douglas K. | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SINHA Zaan | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | GAO Chaney C. | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | PHUKAN Rohin | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | KIM Sullivan | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.