Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 2 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
| 3 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 42% | 8% |
| 3 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 5 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 6 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 7 | GREEN Ummi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 15% |
| 8 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 9 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 19% |
| 10 | CHU Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 11 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
| 12 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% |
| 13 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 14 | AHN Gus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 16 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
| 18 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 19 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 24 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 24 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 26 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | YEH Preston | 100% | 87% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | FEES HOLDEN | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 30 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 84% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 33 | CHU Allan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | COPEN Samuel S. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ONTIVEROS Miller | 100% | 85% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | MUIR Douglas K. | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.