December SJCC + Para NAC

Cadet Men's Épée

Sunday, December 8, 2024 at 2:30 PM

Georgia International Convention Center - Atlanta, GA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KARNAS Karol 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 48%
2 DODIN David 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36%
3 HEADRICK Lance 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 37%
3 RIGGINS Joshua 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 39%
5 LAM Alan 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
6 BOUDREAUX James 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 39% 9%
7 WOLFE Alex 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 41%
8 TIKHONOV Ilia 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 20%
9 KUGLER Luke 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 38% 7%
10 GINZBURG Adam 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 13%
10 LIU Yikun 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 34%
12 FISHMAN Rahm 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 39% 10%
13 BORISENKO Samuel 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 26% 5%
14 NORMILE Nicholas 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 9%
15 DOUBOV Andrew 100% 100% 97% 82% 51% 18% 3%
16 WANG justin 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 26%
17 PAN Tristan 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 12%
18 FU Leon 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 53%
19 LEE Aiden 100% 100% 97% 80% 43% 10%
20 TIKHOMIROV Theodore 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 19%
21 TANG William 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 25% 4%
22 CHEN Leonardo 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 23%
23 ATKINS Levi H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 30%
24 WONG Baron 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
25 HAMZA Tudor 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 24%
26 SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 12%
27 SCHIEK Harrison 100% 99% 91% 66% 30% 6%
28 CHEN Brian 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 22%
29 KIM Henry 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 23% 3%
30 JONES Reilly 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 12%
31 SANTOS Francisco M. 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 22% 3%
32 CHEN Jayden 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1%
33 TIKHONOV Daniel 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 47% 9%
34 LIU Adam 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 27% 5%
34 CHEN Luowen 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
36 MIAO Quentin 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5%
37 XIE Brandon 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 26% 5%
37 XIA Dashan 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 9%
39 ELHUSSEINI Dylan 100% 100% 99% 93% 75% 41% 11%
40 YU Austin 100% 100% 96% 76% 39% 9%
41 ELHUSSEINI Kyle 100% 100% 98% 87% 61% 27% 5%
42 SANTOS Antonio K. 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 3%
43 SINGH Ravin 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 8%
44 PARK Nicholas 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 10%
44 MAO Benjamin 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 42%
46 LEE Anton 100% 99% 86% 53% 19% 3% -
46 SIM Ian 100% 100% 94% 71% 33% 8% 1%
48 CHUNG Andrew 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 3%
49 SHOUSHA Hamza 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 16% 2%
50 KIM Jayden 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 15%
51 SHCHUR Landon 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 25%
51 LEE DoWon 100% 100% 95% 73% 37% 10% 1%
53 NGUYEN Hubert 100% 99% 92% 66% 28% 5%
54 CHIN Dylan A. 100% 100% 97% 80% 44% 11%
55 CHEN Bowen 100% 98% 82% 48% 16% 3% -
56 LEE Aiden 100% 99% 94% 72% 37% 10% 1%
56 WILLIAMS Logan 100% 99% 90% 61% 25% 5% -
58 ZIEGLER John 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 32% 7%
59 SINGLETON Aman 100% 99% 89% 64% 32% 9% 1%
60 DHAL Leon 100% 100% 100% 96% 82% 50% 15%
61 HERNDON Liam 100% 99% 88% 59% 25% 6% 1%
62 HEADRICK Jack 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 5% -
63 GRAVES Lawson 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 29% 5%
64 MEHROTRA Neel 100% 94% 72% 38% 13% 2% -
65 TSE Maxwell 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 30% 5%
66 KHANNA Nikhil 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 24%
67 CLICK Tristan 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 25% 4%
68 LAI Boden 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 44%
69 SIEDOW William 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 20% 3%
70 ALI Farhan 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 29% 5%
71 LOISEAU Eliott 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 51% 15%
72 SAUNIER Cameron 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 12%
73 PARKER Isaiah 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 9%
74 PARK Sangwook 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 42% 9%
75 CARTY JR Johndale 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 18%
76 LESCURE Dimitri 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 26% 4%
77 OSBORN Hunter 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 24% 3%
78 MODANLOU Navid 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 26% 4%
79 SIYANKO Joshua 100% 100% 98% 90% 65% 30% 6%
80 HWANG Aidan 100% 99% 88% 60% 25% 5% -
81 LOISEAU Oscar 100% 100% 96% 76% 40% 12% 1%
82 ERLIKHMAN Adrian 100% 100% 100% 95% 78% 41% 8%
83 KIM Remington 100% 94% 63% 24% 5% - -
84 DAVIDENKO Alexander 100% 100% 94% 75% 41% 13% 2%
85 O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar 100% 96% 75% 40% 13% 2% -
85 ZOGRAFOS Nicholas 100% 100% 96% 76% 40% 12% 1%
87 AHMED Mohsen 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 15% 2%
88 JEONG Arisu 100% 96% 67% 27% 5% -
89 CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 12%
90 KIM Joshua 100% 81% 41% 11% 1% -
91 WANG Marcus 100% 77% 36% 9% 1% - -
92 BUI Henry 100% 100% 98% 88% 63% 29% 6%
93 RIM Eugene 100% 97% 81% 49% 19% 4% -
94 HUANG Kenneth 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 22% 3%
95 LI Ray 100% 92% 57% 20% 4% - -
96 YI Nathan 100% 98% 86% 57% 24% 6% 1%
97 MOORE Alexander 100% 96% 71% 33% 8% 1% -
97 WU Johnny y. 100% 99% 89% 63% 29% 7% 1%
99 LI Ethan R. 100% 100% 99% 88% 60% 24% 4%
100 LIOZNYANSKY Miron 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4% -
101 ZHANG Lucas 100% 96% 78% 45% 17% 3% -
102 LEE Jayden J. 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3%
103 DONNELLY Enzo 100% 96% 76% 39% 11% 1% -
104 JONES Jackson 100% 98% 84% 49% 16% 2% -
104 MORIN-JIANG Jake 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 14% 2%
106 LIU Yueri 100% 100% 98% 90% 64% 28% 5%
107 LIU Zicheng (Andy) 100% 94% 68% 29% 6% 1% -
108 JAIN Samyak 100% 99% 92% 69% 32% 7%
109 WANG Daniel 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 18%
110 BARFORD Giovanni 100% 98% 81% 43% 12% 1%
111 CARDENAS Lucas 100% 97% 79% 42% 11% 1%
112 LI zerong 100% 78% 40% 13% 2% - -
113 LIDSKY Phineas 100% 100% 96% 77% 42% 12% 1%
114 HENSLEY Roran 100% 99% 87% 55% 20% 4% -
115 SAVORETTI Pietro 100% 100% 94% 71% 34% 8% 1%
116 CHO Alex 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3% -
117 PEREZ Daniel 100% 94% 68% 33% 9% 1% -
118 RAVI Arjun 100% 99% 91% 66% 31% 8% 1%
119 ZHENG Jerry 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
120 LU Ryan 100% 97% 78% 40% 11% 1% -
121 MCLAREN Mason 100% 90% 57% 20% 3% - -
122 FEINBERG James Y. 100% 94% 69% 32% 8% 1% -
123 WANG aaron 100% 93% 57% 20% 4% - -
124 BRADSHAW Carter 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 10% 1%
125 JIANG Harry 100% 71% 29% 6% 1% - -
126 RUSSELL James 100% 99% 89% 61% 27% 6% 1%
127 LIN Nathan 100% 88% 56% 21% 4% -
128 HELMY Richard 100% 81% 42% 13% 2% - -
129 WONG Maximus 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
130 YANG Gary 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 17% 3%
131 KROPP Wesley 100% 97% 81% 45% 13% 2% -
132 CHA Patrick 100% 97% 80% 48% 18% 4% -
133 DADE MAXIMUS 100% 89% 56% 22% 4% -
134 ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas 100% 89% 59% 25% 6% 1% -
135 KIM Gene 100% 100% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1%
136 VINOTH Aaron 100% 99% 89% 58% 22% 4% -
137 GONZALEZ Kian 100% 99% 90% 64% 30% 7% 1%
138 SHILOV Maxim 100% 81% 40% 11% 2% - -
139 ARMSTRONG TyLee 100% 94% 69% 33% 9% 1% -
139 LI Yunji (Rain) 100% 100% 98% 88% 63% 29% 6%
139 MARTINEZ KOKICH Julian 100% 66% 24% 5% 1% - -
142 ZHAO Pierce 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1% -
143 RONG Gordon 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
144 KONG Brandon 100% 91% 58% 21% 4% - -
145 MCMILLAN Jackson V. 100% 90% 52% 17% 3% -
146 GUMEDELLI Mohnish 100% 81% 40% 10% 1% -
147 FANG Hanning 100% 98% 82% 47% 13% 1%
148 SUH Aiden 100% 60% 20% 4% - - -
149 HE Bronto 100% 91% 61% 24% 5% - -
149 PARK Andrew 100% 90% 60% 25% 6% 1% -
151 LIN Haley 100% 90% 56% 20% 3% - -
152 MULDOON Thomas 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
153 MOLLINIER Angel 100% 83% 39% 10% 1% - -
154 KIM Sangone 100% 78% 36% 8% 1% - -
155 ROSIELLO Francesco 100% 77% 34% 8% 1% - -
156 GU Eric 100% 68% 26% 5% - - -
157 KARLEKAR Veer 100% 40% 7% 1% - - -
158 PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil 100% 97% 81% 44% 13% 2% -
158 DADE Augustus 100% 52% 11% 1% - - -
160 CHENG Trevor 100% 95% 70% 33% 9% 1% -
161 GADBURY Logan 100% 80% 40% 11% 2% - -
162 CHAWLA Aarav 100% 97% 76% 39% 11% 2% -
163 HONG Daniel 100% 81% 40% 10% 1% - -
164 ZHANG Jason 100% 77% 37% 11% 2% - -
165 ACAR Devin 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% - -
166 DENG Destin 100% 56% 14% 2% - - -
167 LI Grayson 100% 33% 5% - - -
168 OLSON Joseph 100% 64% 21% 3% - - -
168 LEE Wyatt 100% 74% 32% 8% 1% - -
170 SUN Neo 100% 81% 39% 9% 1% - -
170 ANGULO Julian 100% 49% 11% 1% - - -
172 NOLAN Tyler 100% 82% 36% 8% 1% - -
172 RIVERA Noah 100% 90% 46% 13% 2% - -
174 PORIKLI Sedat 100% 48% 11% 1% - -
175 GRANT Grayson 100% 47% 11% 1% - - -
175 LOUDON Luke 100% 52% 13% 2% - - -
177 SHIM Jae 100% 72% 31% 8% 1% - -
178 RAY Jensen 100% 62% 21% 4% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.