Capitol Clash SYC/RCC & Y8

Cadet Men's Épée

Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 12:30 PM

Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center - National Harbor, MD, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FISHMAN Rahm V V V D V V V V V V V V V 5.5 5 -0.5
2 CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) D V D V D V V V V V V V V D 5.2 3 -2.2
3 MITEV Alexander V V V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
3 LAM Alan V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
5 HEADRICK Jack V V V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
6 BOUDREAUX James V D V V V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
7 KIM Henry D V V D V V V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
8 YANG Gary D D V V V V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
9 WOLFE Alex V V V V V D V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
10 DOUBOV Andrew V V V D V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
11 PENG Yue V V D V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
12 LEE Anton D V V V V D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
13 MIDYANY Evan V V V V D D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
14 TIKHONOV Daniel D V V D V V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
15 ZIEGLER John V D D V V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
16 CHEN Brian D V V V D V V V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
17 TIKHONOV Ilia V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
18 SINGLETON Aman V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
18 CHEN Leonardo V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
20 LE BORGNE Matthieu V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
21 ALI Farhan V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
22 NORMILE Nicholas V V V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
23 CHUNG Andrew V V V D V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
24 TRAN Spencer V V V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
25 PETROW Zoryan D V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
26 ZOGRAFOS Nicholas V D V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
27 BORISENKO Samuel V V D V D V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
27 EVANS George V D V V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
29 LI Tristan V V V V D D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
29 VYSOTSKIY Evan V D D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
31 KIM Joshua V V D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
32 CHA Patrick V D V D D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
33 GINZBURG Adam V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
34 YU Austin V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
35 CHEN Ryan V V V D V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
36 KABA Elias V V V V V D V D 3.0 5 +2.0
37 MAO Benjamin D V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
38 TIKHOMIROV Theodore D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
39 SHOUSHA Hamza V V V V V D V D 4.8 5 +0.2
39 LIU Adam V V V V D V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
41 YI Nathan V D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
42 VAN JAARSVELD Leo V V D V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
43 TSE Kirby Zhiheng V V V V D V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
44 JIANG Harry V V V V D V V D 2.0 5 +3.0
45 LEE Aiden V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
46 LEE DoWon V V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
47 SAUNIER Cameron V V D D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
48 RIGGINS Joshua V D V D V V V D 5.7 4 -1.7
49 RIM Eugene V V V D D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
50 CHEN Bowen V D V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
51 MEHROTRA Neel D V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
52 GUMEDELLI Mohnish V D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
53 BRADSHAW Carter D V V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
54 CRESPO Nathaniel Justus V D D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
55 YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki V D V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
56 ZHANG Jonathan V V V D V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
57 CHEN Isaac Zhi D D V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
58 RVACHEV Michael V D V D V V D 3.0 3 -
59 LEE Aiden D V D V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
60 SINGH Ravin D V V D D V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
61 ZHU Yiming D D V D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
62 GANTSOUDES Isaac V D V D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
63 BAGDONAS Olivier D D V D V V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
64 GRIGORENKO Gleb E. V D D D D V V V D 1.7 2 +0.3
65 HSU Joshua V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
66 CHANEY Charles V V D V V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
67 AHMED Mohsen V V V D V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
68 KROPP Wesley V V D D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
69 HERNDON Liam D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
70 WANG Jiacheng V V V V D D D 3.0 4 +1.0
71 LUO Alexander D V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
71 HE Yurui V V D D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
71 DONG Haiyi V V D D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
74 MALHAM Andrew V D V V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
75 BAI Brian V V V D V D D 3.1 4 +0.9
76 ZHANG Albert V V V D D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
77 KIM Gene D D V D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
78 ARMSTRONG TyLee V D D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
79 HENNESSY Levon D V V D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
80 CUMMINGS Owen D V V V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
81 TSIEN Richard D V V D V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
82 LIN Haley V D D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
83 NOOL Alexander D D V V V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
84 CZEPLA Andrew V D V V D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
85 ARMSTRONG Payson V D V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
86 ROSADO Balthazar Francisco D V V V D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
87 YU David D V V V D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
88 WANG Aiden V V V D D D D 3.4 3 -0.4
89 ZHANG Austin D V D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
90 LIDSKY Phineas D D V V V D D 4.1 3 -1.1
91 KE Sebastian V D D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
92 TOWNSHEND Connor D V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
93 RAMEY Daylon D V D V D V D 1.4 3 +1.6
94 ROBERTS Phoenix V V D D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
94 MOU Jaydon D V D V V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
96 LEE Benjamin V D V V D D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
97 DELONG Joshua V V D D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
98 KONG Brandon D V D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
99 OZBAY Alp V D D D V V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
100 SOLOMON Aryeh D D V V V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
100 SZIEDE Kieran V D V V D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
102 DAVIS Andrew D V D D V V D 1.2 2 +0.8
103 NG Nico D V D D V V D 1.7 2 +0.3
104 CHEN Tianjun D D V V D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
105 ADDYSON Aidan D D D D V V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
106 CHEN Jayden V D V D D D V D 4.1 2 -2.1
107 LEECH Braedan D V D V D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
108 WANG Marcus V D V D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
109 CHO Alex D D D V V D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
110 TUMULA Arihaan D D V D V D V D 2.0 2 -
111 DONNELLY Enzo D V D V D D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
111 FOGEL Jake D D D V V D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
113 LEE Henry D D V D V D V D 2.0 2 -
114 GAO Victor D V D D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
115 HALE Bradley V D D D V D V D 1.1 2 +0.9
116 SATISHKUMAR Pranav D D V D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
117 BENNETT Pierce D D D V D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
118 CHAWLA Aarav V D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
119 HERDMAN Julian D D D D V D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
120 LORENZ Nathan D D D D D V V D 1.1 1 -0.1
121 CAFASSO Alexander D D V D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
122 SUNKARA Vishnu D D V D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
122 BAYUS Oliver D V D D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
124 LI Ryan D D D D D V V D 1.9 1 -0.9
125 MARKOWITZ Sam D D V D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
126 HANNA Alexander D D D D D D V D 1.8 0 -1.8
127 GOODMAN Liam D D D D D D V D 1.6 0 -1.6
128 JARRATT Isaac D D D D D D V D 2.1 0 -2.1
129 MARIN Ayan N. D V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
130 TSEN Mason V V D D D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
131 OLSON Joseph V D D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
132 SHAFFER Tyler D V D V D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
133 KIM Remington V D V D D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
134 ROBERTS Arthur V D D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
135 LIN ZIJIE D V D D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
136 VENZON Gavin V D D D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
137 SONG Ryan V D D V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
138 BO Genero D D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
139 MAXWELL Sheito D V V D D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
140 HURLEY Michael V D D V D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
141 PERI Mourya D D V D V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
142 BEREKNYEI Lukas V V D D D D D 3.8 2 -1.8
143 DANG William D D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
144 GRIGGS Kaiden D D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
145 LEE Carson V D D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
146 PENG Ethan D D D D V D D 1.1 1 -0.1
147 GATEWOOD Michael V D D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
148 SMOTHERS Nathan D D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
149 ZHENG Jason D D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
150 LEE Harrison V D D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
151 YAO Tristan V D D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
152 TSANG Aiden D D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
152 CHEN Jayden D D D D D V D 0.7 1 +0.3
154 KARLEKAR Veer V D D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
155 BROSNAN Solomon D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
156 YAZDANFAR Marius D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
157 SLAVIN Tamir D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
157 GRANT Aidan D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
157 REKHI Krish D D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
160 HUANG Max D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
161 KIM Zac D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
162 WELCH Sebastian D D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
163 FENG Xinmin D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
164 QI Bryan D D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
164 JUSTA Rivan D D D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
166 MACTOUGH Ben D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.