The Cherry Blossom - D1A/VET ROC

Div I-A Men's Épée

Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 9:00 AM

University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 KOKENGE Reid V V D V D V V V V V V V 4.0 3 -1.0
2 O'HARA Keegan J. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
3 CAI Brian V V V V D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
3 LEE JoonWon V V D V V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
5 PARK Ian C. D V V V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
6 BOUDREAUX James V V D V V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
7 TIKHONOV Ilia V V D V D V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
8 ZHANG Caden D V V D V V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
9 LE BORGNE Matthieu V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
10 HILBERT Gabriel E. V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
11 TABLEMAN Doug S. V V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
12 KOEPPEL Levi E. V V V V V D V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
13 WOLFE Alex V V V D V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
14 HONDOR Robert D. D V V V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
15 LEE Samuel Y. V D V D V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
16 CHOI Kaiden I. V D V V D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
17 KHANNA Nikhil V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
18 LAM Alan V V V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
19 WICAS Graham E. V V D V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
19 DESSAUER Tobyn M. V V D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
21 LEE Aiden V V V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
22 WANG Aiden V V V D V V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
23 GUMEDELLI Mohnish V D V V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
24 ROSE-JONES Simon V V V V D V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
25 WANG Clayton V V V D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
26 MARTIN Mason V V V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
27 TIKHONOV Daniel V V D V D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
28 TATE William Isom V V D V V D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
29 MEGGERS Davin V D V V D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
30 YU Jason D D V D V V V V D 3.0 3 -
31 CLICK Tristan D D V D V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
32 BORATGIS Christopher J. V D D V D V V D 3.9 2 -1.9
33 SMITH Troy H. V V V V V V D 2.8 6 +3.2
34 FISHMAN Rahm V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
35 SU Caleb V D V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
36 SINGH Ravin V D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
37 HULL Liam V V V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
38 TAMULONIS Fen C. V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
39 MEGGERS Samuel D V V V V V D 1.4 4 +2.6
40 TIRRELL Justin J. V D V V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
41 HEADRICK Lance V D V V V D V D 4.9 4 -0.9
42 MARTINEZ Joshua V V D V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
43 ACAR Devin V D D V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
44 WATERS Nathaniel V D V D V V D 0.7 3 +2.3
45 RUSSELL James V D V V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
46 JIN Owen V V D V D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
47 EVANS Grant V D V D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
48 PAN Colin D V V V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
49 WONG King-Yee V D V V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
50 PETROW Zoryan D V D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
51 HU Robert J. V D V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
52 CHEN Leonardo D V V V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
53 SO Lorenzo V V V D D D V D 3.0 3 -
54 PENG Yue V V D D D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
55 CHEN Brian V D V D V D V D 4.4 3 -1.4
56 KIM kihyeon V D D D V V D 4.2 2 -2.2
57 CHRISTY Peter C. D V D D V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
58 LEWIS Jared V D D D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
59 COCCHINI Lorenzo D D V V D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
60 MONTESI Eric D V V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
61 ALEXANDER Jacksen D D D V V V D 0.7 2 +1.3
62 CARTER Austin L. D V D D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
63 CHO Alex V D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
64 ALI Farhan D D V D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
65 MODANLOU Navid D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
66 BERNARD Jack B. V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
67 BUCCELLATO Joel S. D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
67 LEE Matthew V D V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
69 KE Sebastian V V V D D D 1.5 3 +1.5
70 ANAFI Ari D V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
71 BAGHA Armin V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
72 KAPLAN Maddox V D V D V D 0.7 3 +2.3
73 BEREKNYEI Lukas D V V D V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
74 CAMP Ethan D D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
75 ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas D V D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
76 CHENH Justin D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
77 HOWARD Jackson V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
78 MILLER Jordan D D V V D D 0.8 2 +1.2
78 WALLACE George V D D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
78 WEHMEYER Devin V D D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
81 KYPRAIOS Nicholas V D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
82 KERKHOF Peter L. V D D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
83 HU Alexander W. D V D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
84 ZHU Yiming D V D V D D 0.8 2 +1.2
85 ROTONDI Gregory V. D V D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
85 CANDELARIA Armando D V V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 LEE Benjamin D V D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
88 SZIEDE Kieran D D V V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
89 SAUNIER Cameron D D D V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
89 ARMSTRONG TyLee D V V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
91 BUI Ryan D D V V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
92 MARSH Alex V V D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
93 YANG Gary V D D D D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
94 MONTAGUE Braeden A. D D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
95 KOKENGE Chad D D V D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
95 LIN Yufei D V V D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
97 AKYAMAC Bora D D V V D D D 3.6 2 -1.6
98 SEID Zachary W. D V D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
99 PERILLO Edoardo Filippo Mihai D V D D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
100 SUNKARA Vishnu D V D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
101 YOO Dong Hun V D D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
102 WU Shaochi D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
102 LIN Haley D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
104 RODACHY Jeffrey M. D D V D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
105 YI Nathan D V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
106 HUTZ Michael B. D D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
106 STOUT Zachary D D D D V D 0.7 1 +0.3
108 GANZY Ethan D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
109 ADDYSON Aidan D V D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
110 BANNEN Nicholas D V D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
110 YIN Chujun V D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
112 PANE Patrick D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
113 SHARMA Akshay D D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
114 BROSNAN Solomon D D D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
115 STEPANIAN George D D V D D D D 0.4 1 +0.6
116 LIEMAN David D D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
117 SLOTER Lewis E. D D D D D D 2.4 0 -2.4
118 YAP Nathan D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
119 ZHANG Sen D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
120 MANITT Philip D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
121 ARMSTRONG Gary D D D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
122 MARKOWITZ Sam D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
123 KLINE R. Jay D D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
123 JIN Adam D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.