Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% |
| 2 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 3 | BEALS Alden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 31% |
| 3 | MANN Jake R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% |
| 5 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 6 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
| 7 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 8 | LIN Nathan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 10 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% | |
| 11 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
| 12 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 13 | DUKO Phillip | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 15 | HOWARD Jackson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | DURKIN Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 19 | WANG justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 20 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 21 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
| 22 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 22 | LIDSKY Phineas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 24 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 25 | WANG Tony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 27 | HE Bronto | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 30 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 31 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 32 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 33 | CORBIN Bennett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 27% | |
| 34 | MEN Junda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 35 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 36 | RADENOVIC Vukan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 37 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 38 | LI Morgan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | SHONEMAN Sam | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 40 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 41 | ACAR Devin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 44 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 44 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 46 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 47 | SONG Changze | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 49 | HAN Keyi | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 52 | YU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 54 | ZHAI Avalo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 55 | PETERSEN Zachary | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 56 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 57 | WU Chi Kuan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | LEE Henry | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 64 | EMMERT JP | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 65 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 66 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 67 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 68 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 69 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 70 | FENG Du | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 71 | WONG Maximus | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 72 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 73 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 74 | WU Jerry | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 75 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 76 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 76 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 78 | ZHANG Marcus | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 79 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 80 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 80 | LYCHKO Maksym | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 82 | YANG Alex | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 83 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 84 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 85 | BAI Brian | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 86 | NG Nico | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 87 | CAO Gavin | 100% | 74% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | KIM Remington | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 88 | SIALA Omar | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 90 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 91 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 92 | BATISTA Julian | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 94 | DU Yifan | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 95 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 96 | SCHAUER Oliver | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 97 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 98 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 99 | FRANCISCO Osvaldo | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 100 | GU Eric | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 101 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 90% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 102 | YAZDANFAR Marius | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 103 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 104 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 105 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 106 | SHETTY Mihir | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 107 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 108 | EVANS Joseph | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 109 | ALAM Rajan | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 110 | GAO Victor | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 111 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 66% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 1% |
| 113 | RIM Dongwoo | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 113 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 115 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 116 | LENNON Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 117 | ZHAI Christopher | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | MATOS Adrian | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 119 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 120 | LEE Anton | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 121 | AU Joshua | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 122 | KIM Zac | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 123 | KLINKENBERG Patrick | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.