Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Gi Beom | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 51% | |
| 2 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 3 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 3 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
| 5 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 6 | RYU Dae Hyeon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 3% |
| 7 | QIAN Will | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | |
| 8 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 9 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 34% |
| 10 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 11 | XIAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 12 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 13 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
| 14 | YANG Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 15 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 16 | ZUO Yizhi | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 17 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 18 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 19 | LU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 20 | CHEN Keegan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 21 | SHEN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 52% | 17% |
| 22 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 23 | LIN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 24 | YOON Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 25 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
| 26 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 17% | |
| 27 | FANG Lionel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 30% | 2% | |
| 28 | WU David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 29% | 2% |
| 30 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 11% |
| 31 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 2% |
| 32 | DING Jacob | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 33 | BRADY David | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | MOORE Quinn | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | XIE zhouhan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHEUNG Zachary | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | GOLDSTEIN Tate | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | LIU KUNDE | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 40 | DUAN EDWIN | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 41 | STARK Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 42 | BHOSREKAR Som | 100% | 93% | 60% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | WU Max | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 44 | XU ETHAN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 45 | GUTKOVSKIY Ryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 46 | HE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | STABROWSKI Joaquin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 48 | BLAIS Julian | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 49 | ZHENG Vincent | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 50 | CORCOS Joseph-Georges | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% | 25% | |
| 51 | WU Yulen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 52 | JIANG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 53 | CHAE Emmett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 54 | LEONG Michael | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | LIN Alexander | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 57 | SAVIR Ethan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 58 | PINTOLE Anthony | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 3% | |
| 59 | XIA Wenhao | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 60 | TYRIKOS FRAZIS Dimitri | 100% | 85% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LI Ethan | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | PELLERIN Liam | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | XIONG Jeffrey | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | FOMIN Dashiell | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 66 | CAI Mark | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LEVKOVICH Milan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | CAI Charlie | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 69 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 70 | WANG Grant | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 71 | YANG Crescent | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 72 | MCLENDON Mateo | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 73 | TANAKA Nico | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 73 | LIU Max | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | OBAS Logan X. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 76 | RICHMAN Aaron | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 77 | AWALGAONKAR Aahan | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | POLEBOYINA Aarav | 100% | 66% | 18% | 1% | - | - | |
| 79 | MENZEL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 80 | JAZWINSKI Archer | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 81 | MOSAMEH Faraj | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 82 | FAN Oscar | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | CAI daniel | 100% | 74% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | HARDING James | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | KIM JOSHUA | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | ZEI Julian | 100% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 87 | LIU KELVIN | 100% | 70% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 88 | KIM ISAAC | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 89 | BANGALE Viraaj | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 90 | JUTAGIR Eugene | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 91 | CHEN Aidan | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 92 | KIM Marcus | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 93 | CHAN Theo | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 94 | KIM Rowan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 94 | TANG QIXING (Bruce) | 100% | 99% | 78% | 33% | 5% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.