Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 31% |
| 2 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 3 | AYOTTE James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 3 | ZHAO Zidong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 5 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 6 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 7 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 8 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
| 9 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 10 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
| 11 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 38% | |
| 12 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 13 | FIAMINGO Francisco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% |
| 14 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 15 | ZHANG Kwan Fei(Albert) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
| 18 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 19 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
| 20 | LEHNER Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 7% |
| 21 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
| 22 | ZHU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 2% |
| 23 | GUO Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 25 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 3% |
| 26 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 3% |
| 27 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
| 28 | JONES Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 29 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 30 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 31 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 4% |
| 32 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 33 | LEE Henry | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | DILDA Griffin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | CARNALL Hunter | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 36 | NG Nico | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 37 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 38 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 38 | ROBERTS Phoenix | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 40 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 3% | |
| 41 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 2% | |
| 42 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | BORAN Brooks | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 45 | DELONG Joshua | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 46 | HERDMAN Julian | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 47 | SCORDINSKY Liam | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | ZHU Yiming | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 4% | |
| 50 | ARZT Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 51 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | 1% |
| 53 | SAAD Peter | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | HAVARUSHKA Bahdan | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | MASSIE Jay | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 57 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 58 | WANG Tony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% | |
| 59 | FEELY Benjamin | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 60 | RAMEY Daylon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 62 | PENG Yue | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
| 63 | GATEWOOD Michael | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 64 | EVANS George | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 65 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 66 | MCCABE Kian | 100% | 85% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | CHAU Collin | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 68 | BAYUS Oliver | 100% | 95% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | BROSNAN Solomon | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 70 | HALE Bradley | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | TOWNSHEND Connor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 72 | CHAN Ian | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | GALIOTE James | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | BATISTA Julian | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 74 | PETROVSKI Kiril | 100% | 69% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 74 | EVANS Joseph | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | SALLAI Abel | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 78 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 79 | SAAD Noah | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 80 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 81 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 82 | JARRATT Isaac | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 83 | DAVIS Kai | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | PARY Jean Pierre | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | CHIU Preston | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | ZUNIGA Carlos Andres Flores | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 87 | KUBBA Sauvil | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 88 | STUKALO Egor | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | LORENZ Nathan | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | CHONG Eden | 100% | 71% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 91 | ZAKHAROV Konstantyn | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 92 | CHIU Sebastian | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 93 | BUI Ryan | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 94 | SACKETT Gavin | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.