Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WIMMER Chandler M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 2 | LIU John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 11% | |
| 3 | KIM Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 3 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% | |
| 5 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 16% |
| 6 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
| 7 | KIM Minjun | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 8 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | |
| 9 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | |
| 10 | GALLANT Antoine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 12 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 13 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 14 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
| 16 | MIN MARCUS | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 2% |
| 17 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 18 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 19 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% | 23% | 2% | |
| 20 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 99% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 21 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 22 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 23 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 24 | LU Sebastian X. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | MUN Chur-Yong | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 26 | SALISBURY Cary | 100% | 65% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 28 | YI Jason | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | FU Ethan | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 30 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 31 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 32 | GOLCZEWSKI Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% | |
| 33 | WORRALL Cary | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | SUMMER Zachary | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | CHOU Ryan | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | AKOCS Ethan | 100% | 91% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | GOLDMAN Isaac | 100% | 92% | 53% | 6% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.