Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% | |
| 2 | JIN Nicholas | - | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
| 3 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | - | 3% | 30% | 44% | 20% | 3% | |
| 3 | LOYA Fernando | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 5 | LIANG Aaron | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 6 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | |
| 7 | RANGEL Arturo | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 8 | LIN Kyran | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 9 | PARK Elliot | - | - | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | SHUR Yakov C. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 6% |
| 11 | ZHU Max | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% | |
| 12 | WELLS Tommy R. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 13 | MOHEBI Saam | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 14 | CHON Joshua | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | HIGGINS Branford | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 16 | OH Jonathan | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 17 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 29% | |
| 18 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | LEON Sebastian | - | 1% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 8% | |
| 20 | THOMPSON Chester | - | 4% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 21 | SINGHA Orion | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 22 | USHER Alexander | - | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% |
| 23 | MILEY Nick N. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | MARQUEZ ALDANA EThan Gabriel | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
| 25 | SMITH Zane A. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | 1% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 10% | |
| 27 | WONG Daniel | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 28 | WOMACH Tristan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | JIN daniel | - | 1% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 10% | |
| 30 | FEES HOLDEN | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | BORLAND Isaac | 48% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | CHU Anthony | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% | |
| 33 | BAKER William | 41% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | COMER Alexander J. | 13% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | WESTON Tom | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | AUTELLI Marco | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | TAMHANKAR Neil | 22% | 65% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | MUIR Douglas K. | 8% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | CRONIN Alexander | 35% | 55% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | BISEN Aryaman | 7% | 35% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | MCDONALD Ethan | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | ONTIVEROS Miller | 22% | 51% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | MCGINLEY Walker | 70% | 29% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.