Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 2 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% | |
| 3 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 67% | 23% | 3% | |
| 3 | LOYA Fernando | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 5 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 23% |
| 6 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
| 7 | RANGEL Arturo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 8 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 9 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 23% | 3% |
| 10 | SHUR Yakov C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 6% |
| 11 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | |
| 12 | WELLS Tommy R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% | |
| 13 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | |
| 14 | CHON Joshua | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 16 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 17 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 18 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 19 | LEON Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | 39% | 8% | |
| 20 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | |
| 21 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
| 22 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% |
| 23 | MILEY Nick N. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | MARQUEZ ALDANA EThan Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% |
| 25 | SMITH Zane A. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 26 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 10% | |
| 27 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 28 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 10% | |
| 30 | FEES HOLDEN | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 31 | BORLAND Isaac | 100% | 52% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | CHU Anthony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 33 | BAKER William | 100% | 59% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | COMER Alexander J. | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | AUTELLI Marco | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | TAMHANKAR Neil | 100% | 78% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | MUIR Douglas K. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | CRONIN Alexander | 100% | 65% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | BISEN Aryaman | 100% | 93% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | ONTIVEROS Miller | 100% | 78% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | MCGINLEY Walker | 100% | 30% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.