Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | POPPER Luca G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% |
| 2 | ZHOU Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 3 | CRASWELL Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 3 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 5 | BARREIRO Darren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 2% |
| 6 | MARTIN Liam N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 7 | ARIAS Troy A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 8 | NIXON Christian A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | FENG Kevin T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 10 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | HIRSCHMAN Burton E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 12 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 13 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 22% | 2% |
| 14 | DRAKE Owen G. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 15 | YAO Shun | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 17 | PELLEGRINO Maurício | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 18 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 9% |
| 19 | SCHULTZ Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 20 | PRICE Luke D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 21 | WILSON Victor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 22 | MCCORMICK John B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 23 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | FENWICK Luke A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 25 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | KELSEY Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 27 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 28 | KIM Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | BAKER Julian L. | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | BOCEK Brodee M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 31 | HERBEL Micah O. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | SCHOWALTER Tyler J. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | GOODMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 34 | MOYSE Alexander S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | MORRIS Alex K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 36 | SMITH Ethan H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 37 | KNOWLES Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 38 | ASHER Andrew D. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 40 | SHERWOOD Dominic | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 41 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 42 | CHIEN William | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
| 44 | HURST Palmer | 100% | 78% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 45 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | WINTERSHEIMER Adam | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | STEWART Robert | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | KRAJ Pawel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 49 | RICCHIUTI Nikola | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 50 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | PARK Jong-Eun | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 53 | GLECKNER Aidan | 100% | 96% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | FERNANDEZ Christopher | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | BROWN Nathan P. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 57 | ALI Adam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 59 | BARAFF David | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | GU Brian | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 49% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 62 | HERBEL Dellas O. | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | KOLOCIN John | 100% | 86% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | BARTCH Ethan L. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 67 | RHEA Eric L. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | RITCHIE Mark T. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | BURKE Luke P. | 100% | 88% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | KATOPES Peter | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.