Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
| 2 | GILLISON Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 3 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 3 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 5 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 4% |
| 6 | NOEL Sebastien A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 7 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 8 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
| 9 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 10 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 11 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 12 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 13 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 14 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | LAGARNIA Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 16 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 17 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 12% |
| 18 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 19 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
| 21 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 23 | ALFARO Justus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 24 | EVANS noah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 27 | DALVA Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | LO Jake | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | MING Nathan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | SURAPANENI Arhan | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 34 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CANDIA Trenton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
| 36 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 37 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 38 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | GUPTA-GARCIA Krish | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 42 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LEE Jaden T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 44 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | SACHS Sebastian | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | VERNON Bennett | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SHA Michael | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 52 | COPEN Samuel S. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | CHUNG Michael | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | COPEN Elliot P. | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 90% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.