Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Noah | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 2 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 3 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | 10% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 3 | BEZRODNOV Michael | - | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% | |
| 5 | KIM Byung | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 6 | LIEF Isaac R. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 7 | KUMAR Aidan | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 37% | 6% | |
| 8 | BASOK Nikita | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% | |
| 9 | PARK Frederick | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 12% | |
| 10 | KOKENGE Reid | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 11 | ROYTBURD Samuel | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | MISHIMA Torata | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 13 | KNOX James | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% | |
| 14 | WU Jonathan | 13% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | GONG Haixiang | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 14% | |
| 17 | PARK Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 37% | 5% |
| 18 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHAO corey | 1% | 13% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | CHEN Jun Ho | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | GAO Daniel | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 1% |
| 23 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 44% | 16% | |
| 24 | VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | GWINN William | 28% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 26 | ALKEMA Benjamin | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | WIECHMANN Colin | 27% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 28 | CHANG Benjamin | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 29 | BHATIA Arav | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | BHATIA Rahil | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 32 | KHALITOV Alexander | 1% | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 33 | MING Isaac | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 46% | 46% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | WALCH Logan | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 36 | JIN Derek | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | SHUKLA Raghav | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 38 | CHERPELIS George | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 39 | KALKANIS George | 1% | 7% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 40 | FENG du | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 41 | IVKOV Alexander | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | SOSNICK Samuel | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | CAPEILLERES Theo | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | WANG Max S | 61% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.