Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XIAO Leon (Ruibo) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
2 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% |
3 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
3 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
5 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
6 | HO Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
7 | LIU Niles J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
8 | CANNON Caiden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
9 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
10 | MA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
11 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 19% |
12 | JIMENEZ Diran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
13 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
14 | PELOSKY Ryan F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
15 | SUN Jinfeng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
16 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
17 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
18 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
19 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | < 1% |
20 | RITCHIE Luke W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
21 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
22 | HAN YIMING | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
23 | YANG Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
24 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
25 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
26 | PETER Griffin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
27 | HUTH Jacob | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
28 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
29 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
30 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
31 | PAEK Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
32 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
33 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
34 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
35 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
36 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
37 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
38 | PAULSON Connor M. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
39 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
40 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
41 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% |
42 | BOBROW Logan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
43 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 9% |
44 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
45 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
46 | WU Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
47 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% |
48 | HAN Andersen Y. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
49 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 16% |
50 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
51 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
52 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
53 | THAI William | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 3% |
53 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
55 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
56 | AHN Jun | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
57 | WU Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
58 | WHITEHEAD Amir | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
59 | LEE Chris | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
60 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
61 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
62 | MAURER Ned (John) E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
63 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
64 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
65 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
66 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
67 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
68 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
69 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
70 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 15% |
71 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
72 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
73 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
74 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
75 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
76 | BING Charles | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
77 | KIM Isaiah G. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
78 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
79 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
80 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
80 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
82 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
83 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 12% | |
84 | BAS Liam | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
85 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 99% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
86 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
87 | GALEMORE Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
88 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
89 | VITI Mark G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
89 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
91 | SONG Dylan S. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
92 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
93 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
94 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
95 | CURLEY Sebastian D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
96 | WALTER Evran M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
97 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
98 | ROMANOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% |
99 | LIM Ari | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
100 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
101 | GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
101 | DING Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 3% |
103 | HONDA Kazu Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
104 | BATRAK Alexander | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
105 | LI Jiaan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
105 | WU Jerry | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
107 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
108 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
109 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
109 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
111 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
112 | MILLER Trent D. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
112 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
114 | DALBERG Leif | 100% | 86% | 54% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
115 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
116 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
117 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
118 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
119 | GU Jeffrey | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
120 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
121 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
122 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
123 | DROUTMAN Ryan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
124 | CRALEY Thomas M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
124 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
126 | ROUNTREE Rob | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
127 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
128 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
129 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
130 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
131 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
132 | CHUNG Noah J. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
132 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
134 | PAE Jonathan L. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
135 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
136 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
137 | PAE Brian L. | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
138 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
139 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
140 | ALONSOZANA Luke | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
141 | GAO William | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
142 | WEN George C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
143 | OH SEAN | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
144 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
145 | ANTONIO Marcky C. | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
146 | BOUIE Jacob | 100% | 80% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
146 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
148 | YIM Alex | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
149 | SELL Ethan J. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
149 | TAN Christien | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
149 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
152 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
153 | ADAMS Cyrus | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.