USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Junior Men's Foil

Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 8:00 AM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 XIAO Leon (Ruibo) 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 25%
2 XIAO Ethan J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 43%
3 XIAO Enoch A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 20%
3 HOOSHI Dylan M. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 9%
5 STANLEY Mason B. 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 22% 4%
6 HO Ryan J. 100% 100% 99% 91% 69% 35% 8%
7 LIU Niles J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 52%
8 CANNON Caiden C. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 14%
9 MCCLAIN Bryce C. 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 11%
10 MA Alexander 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 16%
11 LIN Richard W. 100% 100% 100% 97% 86% 56% 19%
12 JIMENEZ Diran 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 23% 3%
13 WU Alexander 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 6%
14 PELOSKY Ryan F. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 15%
15 SUN Jinfeng 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 21% 3%
16 PELOSKY Zack B. 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 20% 3%
17 BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 19%
18 CHOUN Samuel Minwook 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 19%
19 LEE Aidan 100% 96% 79% 47% 18% 4% < 1%
20 RITCHIE Luke W. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 21%
21 JEON Caleb A. 100% 99% 94% 73% 38% 9%
22 HAN YIMING 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
23 YANG Adam 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 42% 11%
24 SHAFAIE Kaveh 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 39%
25 GEE Brandon 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 4%
26 PETER Griffin 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 14%
27 HUTH Jacob 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 19% 3%
28 LI Richard 100% 100% 96% 78% 45% 15% 2%
29 BRUK Peter J. 100% 99% 90% 62% 27% 7% 1%
30 ZHAO Jason L. 100% 100% 97% 80% 45% 14% 2%
31 PAEK Alex J. 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 6%
32 FARQUHARSON Cole 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 10% 1%
33 MITCHELL Philip D. 100% 100% 96% 82% 52% 20% 3%
34 FUKUDA Renzo K. 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 23% 4%
35 SULLIVAN Jackson R. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 25%
36 SONG Aiden S. 100% 100% 97% 82% 52% 20% 3%
37 SINGH Dayaal 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 34% 8%
38 PAULSON Connor M. 100% 98% 88% 62% 29% 8% 1%
39 CHAN Tyler 100% 99% 91% 65% 30% 8% 1%
40 KIM Brandon J. 100% 100% 99% 90% 66% 31% 7%
41 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 52% 11%
42 BOBROW Logan 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 21% 4%
43 CHEN Andrew 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 37% 9%
44 MARX Oscar L. 100% 100% 95% 78% 47% 17% 3%
45 KAO Castor T. 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 21% 3%
46 WU Nicholas 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 26% 4%
47 ANDREWS Nathan J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 21%
48 HAN Andersen Y. 100% 98% 82% 46% 16% 3% -
49 KIM Nicholas W. 100% 100% 99% 96% 81% 50% 16%
50 SHIKHMAN Robert 100% 96% 76% 40% 12% 2% -
51 CHEN Allen 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 21% 3%
52 DESERANNO Jeidus 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 24%
53 THAI William 100% 99% 95% 78% 47% 18% 3%
53 ZHANG Henry C. 100% 100% 97% 82% 51% 18% 2%
55 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 19% 2%
56 AHN Jun 100% 97% 78% 37% 9% 1% -
57 WU Alexander 100% 99% 90% 64% 31% 8% 1%
58 WHITEHEAD Amir 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% - -
59 LEE Chris 100% 99% 91% 64% 29% 7% 1%
60 SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. 100% 98% 84% 54% 22% 5% -
61 PETERS Nathan M. 100% 97% 81% 48% 18% 4% -
62 MAURER Ned (John) E. 100% 100% 100% 95% 79% 45% 12%
63 XIAO EDWARD 100% 96% 74% 37% 11% 2% -
64 GRAHAM Roy J. 100% 98% 84% 53% 19% 3%
65 KWON Ethan 100% 99% 93% 68% 32% 8% 1%
66 FOGELSON Frederick J. 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 12% 1%
67 SCHENCK Koen M. 100% 100% 94% 75% 41% 12% 1%
68 CHENG Jonathan 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 4%
69 CHIN Jason Y. 100% 100% 99% 88% 59% 21% 2%
70 KASI Sanjay 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 15%
71 ZHANG Andy W. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 12%
72 MENG Zhaoyi 100% 68% 26% 5% 1% - -
73 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 16%
74 LAURICELLA Douglas 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 2%
75 NAGER Noah 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 15% 2%
76 BING Charles 100% 98% 83% 47% 15% 2% -
77 KIM Isaiah G. 100% 98% 88% 61% 28% 7% 1%
78 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 20% 3%
79 SANTULLI Tristan 100% 92% 66% 32% 9% 1% -
80 GRISWOLD Abel B. 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
80 BAE Kevin 100% 98% 89% 64% 31% 9% 1%
82 GATZA Logan 100% 95% 69% 31% 8% 1% -
83 GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 12%
84 BAS Liam 100% 98% 83% 51% 18% 3%
85 HSIUNG Richie 100% 99% 75% 34% 9% 1% -
86 DAI Jonathan T. 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 7% 1%
87 GALEMORE Jonathan 100% 96% 79% 47% 18% 4% -
88 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 100% 97% 84% 54% 23% 5% 1%
89 VITI Mark G. 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 8%
89 ZHENG Alan H. 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 17% 2%
91 SONG Dylan S. 100% 100% 88% 54% 20% 3% -
92 RINEHART Conner M. 100% 97% 82% 51% 21% 5% -
93 TIAN Aaron C. 100% 100% 91% 64% 29% 7% 1%
94 DU Samuel R. 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 18% 3%
95 CURLEY Sebastian D. 100% 99% 93% 72% 40% 13% 2%
96 WALTER Evran M. 100% 99% 89% 60% 23% 4% -
97 REZNICK Nicholas J. 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 9% 1%
98 ROMANOV Michael 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 7%
99 LIM Ari 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2%
100 SHA Yi Peng 100% 97% 80% 48% 18% 4% -
101 GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 17% 2%
101 DING Jonathan 100% 99% 94% 77% 46% 16% 3%
103 HONDA Kazu Z. 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 19% 3%
104 BATRAK Alexander 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 15% 2%
105 LI Jiaan 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 22% 4%
105 WU Jerry 100% 99% 91% 67% 34% 10% 1%
107 SCHAEFER Joshua M. 100% 66% 24% 5% - - -
108 LIAO Alex J. 100% 99% 89% 59% 25% 6% 1%
109 XIAO Anthony 100% 99% 88% 58% 24% 5% -
109 CHIN Julian S. 100% 100% 92% 67% 32% 8% 1%
111 LIU Eric P. 100% 99% 94% 73% 41% 13% 2%
112 MILLER Trent D. 100% 95% 70% 33% 9% 1% -
112 HUTH Mitchell 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 24% 4%
114 DALBERG Leif 100% 86% 54% 22% 5% 1% -
115 FUKUDA Alessio R. 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 22% 4%
116 YEROKHIN Michael N. 100% 99% 93% 72% 40% 13% 2%
117 FU Samuel Y. 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 12% 1%
118 SICHITIU Alexander 100% 99% 92% 66% 30% 7% 1%
119 GU Jeffrey 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1% -
120 BUERGIN Aidan 100% 75% 34% 9% 1% -
121 FREEDMAN Samuel E. 100% 97% 77% 41% 13% 2% -
122 DOCTOR Aidan L. 100% 96% 77% 40% 11% 1% -
123 DROUTMAN Ryan 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
124 CRALEY Thomas M. 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 12% 1%
124 KLEIN Sebastian W. 100% 79% 35% 8% 1% - -
126 ROUNTREE Rob 100% 93% 68% 33% 10% 1% -
127 BELLUOMO David C. 100% 70% 29% 7% 1% - -
128 LOVE Aaron 100% 65% 24% 5% 1% - -
129 TORRES Treston 100% 60% 19% 3% - - -
130 CAI Oliver K. 100% 84% 42% 11% 1% - -
131 TSAI Max W. 100% 71% 27% 5% 1% - -
132 CHUNG Noah J. 100% 86% 52% 20% 5% 1% -
132 LE Vyn A. 100% 91% 64% 29% 8% 1% -
134 PAE Jonathan L. 100% 97% 79% 45% 15% 3% -
135 LIU Eric Y. 100% 85% 48% 17% 3% - -
136 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 100% 74% 27% 4% - - -
137 PAE Brian L. 100% 84% 49% 18% 4% - -
138 YU Jonathan J. 100% 67% 21% 3% - - -
139 HOOSHI Jayden C. 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 15% 2%
140 ALONSOZANA Luke 100% 62% 19% 3% - - -
141 GAO William 100% 52% 14% 2% - - -
142 WEN George C. 100% 98% 86% 59% 27% 7% 1%
143 OH SEAN 100% 96% 79% 48% 18% 4% -
144 ZHENG zhe 100% 48% 11% 1% - - -
145 ANTONIO Marcky C. 100% 85% 44% 12% 2% - -
146 BOUIE Jacob 100% 80% 41% 13% 2% - -
146 STRAYER Andrew 100% 86% 50% 16% 3% - -
148 YIM Alex 100% 78% 38% 11% 2% - -
149 SELL Ethan J. 100% 93% 62% 26% 6% 1% -
149 TAN Christien 100% 59% 18% 3% - - -
149 CHEN Matthew 100% 19% 2% - - - -
152 DRESSEL Jet 100% 32% 5% - - - -
153 ADAMS Cyrus 100% 14% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.