Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EMMER Chase T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% |
| 2 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 3 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 3 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 5 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 6 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 7 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 8 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 9 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
| 10 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 11 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 12 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 14 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 15 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
| 16 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 17 | BALL James T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 18 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | 1% |
| 19 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 20 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 21 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 22 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 23 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 24 | DALBERG Leif | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 25 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 64% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 27 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | BROWN Alexander R. | 100% | 79% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | JUDD Mehta J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 30 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
| 32 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 33 | WANG Alex L. | 100% | 92% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | BURNS Andrew | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | AMODEMO Charles | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | DYCKMAN Andrew P. | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | MACHADO Tate | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.