Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports Center - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | EKE Frank | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
2 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 33% |
3 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
3 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
5 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
6 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
7 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
8 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
9 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% | |
10 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
11 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 19% | |
12 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
13 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
14 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
15 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
16 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
17 | KIM William M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
18 | ROSENBERG Jacob | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
19 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
20 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
21 | PERSAUD Daivik | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
22 | REDDY Arya | 100% | 98% | 75% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
23 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
24 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
25 | SKAALAND Will | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
26 | SHEN Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
27 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
28 | GORTI Agustya | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
29 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
30 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
31 | CHOE Andrew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
32 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 85% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | LIEF Isaac R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% |
34 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% |
35 | WEI HUNTER | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | LAI Coby | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
37 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
38 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
39 | JANKOWICH Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
40 | SCYPINSKI Andrew | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
41 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
42 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
43 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | |
44 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
45 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
46 | WHITEHURST JJ | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 25% | 3% | |
47 | SHULKIN Mark | 100% | 84% | 37% | 6% | - | - | |
48 | JOSLIN Tyler | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
49 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
50 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
51 | WIECHMANN Colin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
52 | LIU Joe | 100% | 94% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
54 | WANG Max S | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | SUN Jason | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
56 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
57 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
58 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
59 | BENCZE Kristof | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
60 | BYUN Kevin | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
61 | MING Isaac | 100% | 63% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.