New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BRUK Peter J. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 4% | 
| 2 | UM Ethan A. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | 
| 3 | HOLMES Stuart S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 61% | 
| 3 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 5 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | 
| 6 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | 
| 7 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | 
| 8 | BAS Liam | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 
| 9 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | 
| 10 | DESANDO Michael R. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | 
| 11 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | 
| 12 | LI Owen | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | 
| 13 | LINALDI Alberto | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% | 
| 14 | WU Alexander | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% | 
| 15 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% | 
| 16 | KWON Ethan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% | 
| 17 | LI Richard | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 49% | 13% | 
| 18 | KATAYAMA Kevin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | 
| 19 | SINGH Dayaal | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | 
| 20 | ZOBEL Eric H. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | 
| 21 | SHA Yi Peng | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | 
| 22 | DU Samuel R. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | 
| 23 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | 
| 24 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 25 | SCHENCK Koen M. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
| 26 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | 
| 27 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | 
| 28 | SIEGEL Elliot | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | 
| 29 | ANTON Nathaniel | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | 
| 30 | RITCHIE Luke W. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% | 
| 31 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% | 
| 32 | KIM Yonjae | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | 
| 33 | YU Vinni | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | 
| 34 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% | 
| 35 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 
| 36 | LI Eric | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | 
| 37 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 38 | LAURICELLA Douglas | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% | 
| 39 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - | 
| 39 | BUERGIN Aidan | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | 
| 41 | TEMPLE Jackson | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | 
| 42 | KEE Andrew L. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | 
| 43 | BELLUOMO David C. | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - | 
| 44 | BING Charles | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | 
| 45 | HEMPE Jake | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | 
| 46 | WELCH Kyle J. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 47 | AHN Jun | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 48 | PYO Michael M. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | 
| 49 | JOSEPH Willem | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | 
| 50 | FU Samuel Y. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | 
| 51 | TORRES Treston | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 52 | ACHILOV Sayid | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | 
| 53 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - | 
| 54 | BAE Kevin | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 11% | 1% | 
| 55 | LI Matthew | 2% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | 
| 56 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | 
| 57 | GONG Benjamin | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% | 
| 58 | LEE Jacob J | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | 
| 59 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 60 | GU Andrew | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - | 
| 61 | ADLER David R. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | 
| 62 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 
| 63 | SHIN Joshua J. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | 
| 64 | SONG Bryan | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 65 | JAUME Andrei | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | 
| 66 | ZHEN Ethan | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | 
| 67 | JIMENEZ Diran | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | 
| 68 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | 
| 69 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - | 
| 70 | BOBROW Logan | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% | 
| 71 | WANG Mason | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | 
| 72 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | 21% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - | 
| 73 | CAI Oliver K. | 4% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 74 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% | 
| 75 | DOBBINS Evan W. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% | 
| 76 | LE Vyn A. | 2% | 16% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | 
| 77 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 78 | JIN Dennis H. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 79 | PAN Eric | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | LIN James G. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 81 | LIN Michael | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 82 | PO Oliver | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 83 | MOO Gareth G. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 84 | JIANG Owen | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 85 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 2% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | 
| 86 | GALLER Dave | 47% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - | 
| 86 | TALLARICO Matthew | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 88 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 
| 88 | TSAI Max W. | 6% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | 
| 88 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | 
| 91 | KNIZHNIK David | 16% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - | 
| 92 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - | 
| 93 | WANG Michael | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 94 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - | 
| 94 | MENG Zhaoyi | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - | 
| 96 | FU Yifan | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | 
| 97 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | 
| 97 | SHADPOOR Ryan | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - | 
| 99 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - | 
| 100 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 19% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - | 
| 101 | LI Ayren | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - | 
| 102 | REZA Farazi | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - | 
| 103 | AMRANI David | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.