New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BRUK Peter J. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
2 | UM Ethan A. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
3 | HOLMES Stuart S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 61% |
3 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
5 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% |
6 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
7 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
8 | BAS Liam | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
9 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
10 | DESANDO Michael R. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
11 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
12 | LI Owen | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
13 | LINALDI Alberto | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
14 | WU Alexander | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
15 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
16 | KWON Ethan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
17 | LI Richard | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 49% | 13% |
18 | KATAYAMA Kevin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
19 | SINGH Dayaal | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
20 | ZOBEL Eric H. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
21 | SHA Yi Peng | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
22 | DU Samuel R. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
23 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
24 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
25 | SCHENCK Koen M. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
26 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
27 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
28 | SIEGEL Elliot | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
29 | ANTON Nathaniel | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | RITCHIE Luke W. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
31 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
32 | KIM Yonjae | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
33 | YU Vinni | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
34 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
35 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
36 | LI Eric | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
37 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
38 | LAURICELLA Douglas | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
39 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
39 | BUERGIN Aidan | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
41 | TEMPLE Jackson | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
42 | KEE Andrew L. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
43 | BELLUOMO David C. | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - |
44 | BING Charles | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
45 | HEMPE Jake | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
46 | WELCH Kyle J. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
47 | AHN Jun | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
48 | PYO Michael M. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
49 | JOSEPH Willem | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
50 | FU Samuel Y. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
51 | TORRES Treston | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
52 | ACHILOV Sayid | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
53 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
54 | BAE Kevin | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
55 | LI Matthew | 2% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
56 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
57 | GONG Benjamin | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
58 | LEE Jacob J | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
59 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
60 | GU Andrew | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
61 | ADLER David R. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
62 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
63 | SHIN Joshua J. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
64 | SONG Bryan | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
65 | JAUME Andrei | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
66 | ZHEN Ethan | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
67 | JIMENEZ Diran | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
68 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
69 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
70 | BOBROW Logan | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
71 | WANG Mason | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
72 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | 21% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
73 | CAI Oliver K. | 4% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
74 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
75 | DOBBINS Evan W. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
76 | LE Vyn A. | 2% | 16% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
77 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
78 | JIN Dennis H. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
79 | PAN Eric | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
80 | LIN James G. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
81 | LIN Michael | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
82 | PO Oliver | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
83 | MOO Gareth G. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
84 | JIANG Owen | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
85 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 2% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
86 | GALLER Dave | 47% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
86 | TALLARICO Matthew | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
88 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
88 | TSAI Max W. | 6% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
88 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
91 | KNIZHNIK David | 16% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
92 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
93 | WANG Michael | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
94 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
94 | MENG Zhaoyi | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
96 | FU Yifan | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
97 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
97 | SHADPOOR Ryan | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
99 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
100 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 19% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
101 | LI Ayren | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
102 | REZA Farazi | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
103 | AMRANI David | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.