Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LATIF Imran Zakariyya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 2 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 3 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
| 3 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | < 1% |
| 5 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 16% |
| 6 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 7 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | 8% |
| 8 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 9 | LEONE Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 10 | GIUSSANI Edoardo | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 11 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 12 | LAZARRE Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 13 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 14 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 15 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 16 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 17 | SONN Rohan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
| 20 | SILVERS Ari | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% |
| 21 | AYALA Nayen L. | 100% | 97% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 22 | ZHANG Kingston | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 23 | SCHWAN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 24 | WALIGORA Sebastian | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 25 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | WALIGORA Krystian | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 28 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 29 | LOWENSTEIN Isaac | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 30 | LEWIS Jonathan | 100% | 84% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | THOMPSON North D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 32 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 33 | TASKIRAN Mete | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 34 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | BURNETT Gideon | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | ADAS Julian | 100% | 93% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.