Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% |
| 2 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 3 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 5 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 6 | WU Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 7 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
| 8 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 46% | 7% |
| 9 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 10 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 18% | 1% |
| 11 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 5% |
| 12 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 13 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 14 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 15 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 16 | LEUNG Wai Chi Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 17 | WAN Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 53% | 9% |
| 18 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
| 19 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 20 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 21 | LIN Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | WOO Christian | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 25 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | NEWELL Ian A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 4% |
| 27 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | LI Matthew | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 7% | - | - |
| 33 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% | |
| 34 | OH SEAN | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 35 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 37 | PAN Henry | 100% | 96% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | 4% |
| 39 | WANG Winston | 100% | 96% | 68% | 24% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 41 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | GAO William | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | ALONSO Vinicius | 100% | 99% | 82% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 46 | SONG Austin | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 97% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 50 | PRASANNA Advaith | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KUMAMOTO Sota | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 13% | 1% |
| 52 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 53 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 54 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | POLONSKI Anthony | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | CHOI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
| 57 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 92% | 57% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | VIVEROS Antonio | 100% | 86% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 60 | LONG Connor M. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 62 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 65 | QUINN Nathan | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | KAN Edward | 100% | 46% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 67 | JEFFERS Edison | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.